Bible Pay

Show Posts

This section allows you to view all posts made by this member. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to.

Messages - MIP

Pages: 1 ... 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 [12] 13 14 15 16 17
TestNet Discussion Archive / Re: Android mobile wallet - TEST
« on: April 26, 2018, 01:29:16 PM »
MIP this is really awesome. I deleted your "beta" version app, then install from Google Store and recover.
All without problems. Awesome. Thanks a lot.
Importing key is not working for me now, with message "The private key is empty". Will be waiting for explorer :)

Yep... That's the reason. As google play might take a random time to publish the app, and I'm leaving for a long journey tomorrow, I preferred to publish it today. Surprisingly it became searchable in less than 2 hours.

I sent Rob the badge for download section in the web and I leave him the honour to make the official announcement. Import will be available as soon as Licht's explorer is upgraded next sunday.

TestNet Discussion Archive / Re: Android mobile wallet - TEST
« on: April 26, 2018, 08:53:15 AM »
Awesome, awesome, awesome! It it correct that it is already released?

I sent it for release but it's better to wait until explorer is ready. And I would prefer Rob to do the honours and the announcement  :)

TestNet Discussion Archive / Re: Android mobile wallet - TEST
« on: April 26, 2018, 04:52:36 AM »
Private key imports tested with Licht's test explorer. As soon as he considers it's worth moving to Live explorer, we release the Android wallet!

Tests are taking a while as Licht's test server is still indexing blocks... it's now on 39638. getutxos seem to be working as expected. As soon as it catches up I'll test with one paper wallet and if it works we will publish the android version.

How about applying for Graviex? looks good with a GDAX-like interface

Ok, I think I finished polishing, development is finished.

I sent the update to Lichtsucher so he can do a final test of the last version on his environment.

As soon as this is published in biblepay-central explorer, I will release the Android mobile app in Google Play.

Great job!  Im glad you got the API path to expose the UTXOs, and figured out a way to persist the UTXO value in the database!

Im sure Lich will be happy to resync his chain!


It's better to give it a good try first on a test environment, I want to be sure that this add-on is not impacting on the performance (it should not). However it will eat some storage, for example addresses collection takes about 180MB now and processing time for each transaction is slower than before.

I also found some glitches in PoDC staking addresses, as some UTXOs are not properly removed from the database array.
But we are quite close.

Archived Proposals / Re: BiblePay mobile wallet (Android & iOS)
« on: April 14, 2018, 01:56:53 PM »
About the iOS wallet, I had 2 possibilities:

- Use the same BRCore SPV client as in Android. This would mean "upgrading" all the iOS development to use this version.
- Use the last iOS version that compiles for me (build 156 from Nov 2017) and then adapt the older BRCore  version back to connect BiblePay network.

As I am more a "orange belt" in iOS development, and "black belt" in C/C++, I went with the second option.

First transaction sent from iOS!

I loaded the same wallet as the android app, so in fact you can see my other test transactions made in the last days from the Android device.

Here is the import transaction we made yesterday from a paper wallet in Android, as seen in the iPhone

UI is not the "cutting-edge" version.., but feature-wise it's exactly the same app we have in Android.

Now I will proceed to change colors, icons, strings, etc.

TestNet Discussion Archive / Re: Android mobile wallet - TEST
« on: April 14, 2018, 06:27:36 AM »
I've downloaded latest version and I have still there "Bitcoin Nodes" in advanced settings, but after clicking on that there is "Biblepay Nodes".
So I don't know if it is still bug, or I have bad version.

The version you have is fine for testing. The version with the label fix is still in develepment, I will wait until the paper wallet sweep is ready to publish a new one.

TestNet Discussion Archive / Re: Android mobile wallet - TEST
« on: April 13, 2018, 03:40:54 PM »
There is still old version (211) on your link.
And what about importing? How it looks?
Do you have any schedule for it? :)
After that it will be easy to make promo for Biblepay.
Print paper wallets with QRs and on the other side with QR code to Google play store :)
And then just fill with some coins and make giveaway on street or front of the church :)

I have to debug some problem with utxo maintenance in explorer code, that affects PoS transactions, and then some more tests with Lichtsucher. Then it will be a matter of hours to publish it.

Nevermind the 211 version, just take the one in the link, it's the last one.

TestNet Discussion Archive / Re: Android mobile wallet - TEST
« on: April 13, 2018, 09:34:51 AM »
A minor thing I noticed:

In the 'advanced settings' tab, the nodes are called 'Bitcoin Nodes' instead of 'BiblePay Nodes'.  If you click on it, it will display 'BiblePay-nodes'.

Noted and fixed in dev

Archived Proposals / Re: BiblePay mobile wallet (Android & iOS)
« on: April 13, 2018, 09:07:40 AM »
Say hello to the first transaction made by our BiblePay Android Wallet app, sweeping funds from a paper wallet QR private key.

Utxo info has been taken from my local block explorer webserver with the Iquidus upgrade patch.

Almost there!


I just wanted to say that you are doing a fantastic job. I will be voting for your proposals.
Also, I am not sure if others are like me, but I usually wait intil the last week before the superblock to vote, just so that I get a good idea of what is in the budget.


I agree, voting the last week should be the right approach, as several proposals could be competing for the same resources, and votes should work as a way to prioritize the most critical projects.

In this particular month, I think the only IT proposals are mine but there could be a month where this is not the case.

Archived Proposals / Re: Proposal idea: airdrop
« on: April 13, 2018, 02:18:25 AM »
This is very interesting, because even if we reach only a low % of  the total audience, that will be still a lot of new people interested in this project.

Proposal created. Kindly consider to vote for this proposal, included in this month IT budget, if you find it interesting:

gobject vote-many 03aa25b80bf951bcaaed1589a52c8cd8cf58893912df176c2b4bafef47d90296 funding yes

Thenk you

Pages: 1 ... 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 [12] 13 14 15 16 17