Bible Pay

Recent Posts

Pages: 1 [2] 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
11
Pre-Proposal Discussion / Re: Mass Adoption for BiblePay II
« Last post by Rob Andrews on December 15, 2018, 11:53:16 am »
Quote from: thesnat21 on December 15, 2018, 06:31:54 am
We will always have both,  POG will take 80% but the plan was POBH would earn 20% (block miner)

Exactly, this way solo mining pays 20% but the lions share of the pool is in-client. 

Note that I think it would be a really good idea for us to test POG in prod with POBH only (as we all agreed on so far) and write down exactly how many pool miners (in POG) we see per day - for example a pool.biblepay.org report that pulls in the exec pogpool stats in SQL so we can make a graph.  It would be very valuable to see if POG results in a daily increase in biblepay use. 

Of course we can just add pog diff to the current difficulty chart also.

12
Pre-Proposal Discussion / Re: Mass Adoption for BiblePay II
« Last post by thesnat21 on December 15, 2018, 06:31:54 am »
Quote from: jmmc on December 15, 2018, 03:41:18 am
Can we keep both PoBH and POG ? To me, more mining options is better.

We will always have both,  POG will take 80% but the plan was POBH would earn 20% (block miner)
13
Active Discussions / Re: Testnet - Test Proof of Giving
« Last post by thesnat21 on December 15, 2018, 06:30:53 am »
Ok, Testnet seems stuck at block 87697
14
Pre-Proposal Discussion / Re: Mass Adoption for BiblePay II
« Last post by jmmc on December 15, 2018, 03:41:18 am »
Can we keep both PoBH and POG ? To me, more mining options is better.
15
Active Discussions / Re: Testnet - Test Proof of Giving
« Last post by thesnat21 on December 14, 2018, 12:50:25 pm »
restarted mine..

Having issues getting peers however, is the main node up?
16
Active Discussions / Re: Testnet - Test Proof of Giving
« Last post by Rob Andrews on December 14, 2018, 11:02:35 am »
Anyone with a chain height higher than 87000, please erase and resync.

The problem is if your height was higher than us when you upgraded, you let more blocks in on 1.1.6.5 (that will be rejected by 1.1.6.6) so its preventing us from syncing.
17
Production Proposals / Re: Use Discourse as Main Forum
« Last post by Rob Andrews on December 14, 2018, 09:44:29 am »
Quote from: thesnat21 on December 14, 2018, 08:27:44 am
It's on my list.. not the highest priority (Working building out the web toolset.  BiblepayRabbi is an interesting name, but I thought the term was reserved for Jewish teachers...  We need something scholarly but biblical.. )

I do think it will help adoption, I will work on it as I need distractions/mental breaks from my main tasks. 

Apparently there is a conversion script available, I will look into it more.

I agree Rabbi isn't going to fit, I said it in the sense of an oracle, but its too hard to justify with the gospel at the same time on the front lines.

18
Production Proposals / Re: Use Discourse as Main Forum
« Last post by thesnat21 on December 14, 2018, 08:27:44 am »
Quote from: Rob Andrews on December 13, 2018, 01:37:31 pm
I agree on almost all of the above points and discourse doesnt look too bad, especially if PIVX uses it.

Im neutral on this subject- so I think we should let thesnat weight in more on this as I feel we would be pushing the lions share of work over to him if we switch to discourse.  (Especially if he is willing to be hosting the forum etc).  He might be working on POG PHP pages, or proposal enhancements, or wanting to run a copy of dashninja (we should consider calling that BiblePayRabbi if we ever do that) etc.  I would like to see how he would like to spend his next 6 month time.  If he wants to push this off and still do it later please let us know Snat.

It's on my list.. not the highest priority (Working building out the web toolset.  BiblepayRabbi is an interesting name, but I thought the term was reserved for Jewish teachers...  We need something scholarly but biblical.. )

I do think it will help adoption, I will work on it as I need distractions/mental breaks from my main tasks. 

Apparently there is a conversion script available, I will look into it more.
19
Active Discussions / Re: Testnet - Test Proof of Giving
« Last post by MIP on December 14, 2018, 02:35:42 am »
Quote from: Rob Andrews on December 13, 2018, 09:30:38 pm
1.1.6.6 - Mandatory Upgrade for TestNet


The new version is ready.

MacOS version is ready and Linux PPAs are building now
20
Active Discussions / Re: Testnet - Test Proof of Giving
« Last post by Rob Andrews on December 13, 2018, 09:30:38 pm »
1.1.6.6 - Mandatory Upgrade for TestNet


The new version is ready.

Pages: 1 [2] 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10