Bible Pay

Recent Posts

Pages: 1 [2] 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
11
BiblePay discussion / Re: Economical model thoughts and current state
« Last post by EmmittD on October 04, 2019, 07:35:49 am »
Has there been any development in blockchain for you to be able to get the clearer picture at this point, Rob?
12
Pre-Proposal Discussion / Re: Exchange Listing - p2pb2b.io
« Last post by togoshigekata on October 04, 2019, 01:43:01 am »
I cant edit my post, here is smaller image of Official Listing Price:
https://imgur.com/a/AfONYV4
13
Pre-Proposal Discussion / Exchange Listing - Livecoin
« Last post by togoshigekata on October 04, 2019, 01:40:28 am »
CoinMarketCap
https://coinmarketcap.com/exchanges/livecoin/

Website
https://www.livecoin.net

"We can enable this coin within 1-2 weeks after the payment for listing is received.
The cost of listing new coins based on independent blockchain with us - 5 BTC.

By choosing the LiveCoin Exchange as a partner, you will get an access to a unique trading platform, providing reliable, fast, responsive service for new and experienced traders without limitations:
- Trading platform with $20m daily volumes approved by CoinMarketCap methodology;
- Simple, user-friendly API, a fast-responding API with websocktes;
- Access to our 1.6 million users community;
- Running contests, Airdrops, and events for building up your coin community."
14
Pre-Proposal Discussion / Exchange Listing - p2pb2b.io
« Last post by togoshigekata on October 04, 2019, 01:38:53 am »
CoinMarketCap:
https://coinmarketcap.com/exchanges/p2pb2b/

CoinGecko
https://www.coingecko.com/en/exchanges/p2pb2b

Website:
https://p2pb2b.io/

Headquartered in Estonia, most of their traders are from Eastern Europe

=

I emailed their listing address, and talked with their head of listing Max over Telegram

"Your project is engaged in charity work and this is a very correct decision. In this regard, I can give you a discount. We always support such projects and I hope that I can get discount approval with my CEO"

=

Listing Roadmap
https://drive.google.com/file/d/1ineHDmnAKfZsjUB11upfnaSYfCRviwnx/view?usp=sharing

=

Official Listing Price
https://i.imgur.com/wXfQNZ8.jpg

=

"Head of Listing / IEO | p2pb2b.io, [04.10.19 01:26]
The best offer for you:

- listing on p2pb2b.io
 
- announcements in social media accounts (FB, Twitter, Telegram group, Telegram channel) of the exchange and email marketing campaign for more than 300K users
- announcements on the exchange (News, blog)
- Support Volume for 3 months for each pair 3-5 BTC / per day)
- provides API Trading Commission: 0% for 3 months (up to 4 accounts)
- Trading pairs: token / BTC, token /  ETH, token / USD, token / USDT, token / UAH, token / EURO
- personal listing manager
- quick listing 3 work days

- fee - 2 BTC upfront payment

=

Head of Listing / IEO | p2pb2b.io, [04.10.19 01:27]
We can split the payment into 2 parts if it is convenient for you. 50% deposit and 50% after 2 weeks"

=

Exchange comparison
https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/u/3/d/1WojjK8v69EMx6WM2vfP3GmwrchVlwxo-IZsKm4aXcao/edit#gid=1982182214
15
Production Proposals / Re: Lower ABN Requirement?
« Last post by sunk818 on October 03, 2019, 09:38:13 am »
I say raise ABN requirements to 256k.
16
Production Proposals / Re: Lower ABN Requirement?
« Last post by Rob Andrews on October 02, 2019, 08:50:54 pm »
Rob,

So if we lower the ABN requirement, do you have any concerns that could lead to more forking? I know that was one of the concerns when you first implemented this functionality. Also would a lower ABN then lead to higher difficulties on blocks? Thoughts?

Well I have pretty great news in that dept!

The great news is we found the cause of the fork (luckily because of a few smoking guns between different broken down sancs over the 3 or so we experienced).
I had a network of sancs for a while (before apollon) and I was able to run a report - similar to the sanctuary health report we have now.
Basically, our code (prior to 1447) had a gobject propagation issue - primarily because 40% of the network did not upgrade during the *last* mandatory (the one 75 days ago).

Anyway - I believe *all forking* was a result of bad GSC vote propagation.

Heres the scenario:
When the contract came up, 40% of the network who didnt have the votes didnt honor the superblock.

Another words, our ABNs work fine at any level.

The other evidence I have, is testnet is rock solid now - and it has a diff below 1.
So not only are ABNs ok at any level, but Diff is OK at any level.

On another side note, once we implement chainlocks we also wont have to worry about 51% attacks either.


So basically it should not matter.

17
Production Proposals / Re: Lower ABN Requirement?
« Last post by jsheets1970 on October 02, 2019, 07:48:47 pm »
Shall we change the ABN requirements, Saints?

To be more friendly to new users?

Rob,

So if we lower the ABN requirement, do you have any concerns that could lead to more forking? I know that was one of the concerns when you first implemented this functionality. Also would a lower ABN then lead to higher difficulties on blocks? Thoughts?
18
Production Proposals / Lower ABN Requirement?
« Last post by Rob Andrews on October 02, 2019, 05:13:58 pm »
Shall we change the ABN requirements, Saints?

To be more friendly to new users?

19
Hi Everyone,

So with DSQL/Christian Spaces coming out, we have a lot related to the Develop QT wallet we can test in the DSQL thread.

Im going to keep both threads open, but I invite you all to join me here for a while:
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5188626.0

Because we will be having a new testnet develop release tonight with some new features and you all can help test those in the bitcointalk thread.

Thanks!

20
Thats great!  I'll be back after we release this mandatory in mainnet.

Things look pretty solid in testnet so far.

Pages: 1 [2] 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10