Show Posts
This section allows you to view all posts made by this member. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to.
Updated 4 nodes to 1.0.9.5b. Let us know when the windows wallets are ready. Thanks.
Sorry I haven't had time to keep testing lately. V busy at work. I'll update asap. I have a couple months left over credit at some vps server providers so I will look to add these to Rosetta. I have no other use for them!Sweet!
Hey guys, hold off on testing 1.0.9.5, I discovered a sync bug.
The good news is I think this has been causing problems in testnet.
Ill have this fixed in 30 minutes.
Is it our system that is going to work differently? Because BOINC says https://boinc.berkeley.edu/wiki/Computation_credit "Recent average credit: The average number of Cobblestones per day granted recently. This average decreases by a factor of two every week." And the only other discussions I've seen on line about BOINC compute it the same way. So it that document out of date, am I misunderstanding what it says or is our system utilizing a different factor?
My understanding of RAC was it was a weekly half life, so days 0-7 = 100%, 8-14 = 50%, 15-21=25%, etc. etc.
So by my understanding after a week you can roughly estimate that a particular machine will do about double that over the long haul
1 week 50%
2 weeks 75%
3 weeks 87.5%
4 weeks 93.75%
... ...
99% at 7 weeks.
Is that a misunderstanding?
Additionally, I was thinking and wondering if there might be some benefit to the system to require a larger "stake" for higher RAC? This could alleviate the phone / unbanked poor issue and also be more equitable for the larger RAC users (like it seems like I'm going to be one of). So basically a graduated system where there were three or four tables for Biblepay UTXO Reward Chart or maybe making it a percentile based affair? Such as Stake amount required = 2*RAC for 100% (just spit balling)? Looking at the leader board, I see a good number of users with RAC in the tens of thousands (and again, I may be one of them at some point), but I don't believe it to be equitable that a 1000 RAC user and a 10,000 RAC user both require the same 50K BBP stake for 100%.
Beyond that, it seems like PoDC is working very very well! Are we still on target for a mid-to-end-of-March (barring any other significant issues) shift to PoDC?
Rob, I think you know but it wasn't apparent from the conversation. Also, I could not find where you said you started both at the same time in the last 2 pages of this forum, and that was the main point. If I were to compared RAC numbers I would only compare after 4 weeks, at 2 weeks it's still only roughly 80% of what it should be. IF yo ustarted both at the same time then it wouldn't matter as much.
Rob, the RAC is accurate from box to box but in the beginning it needs to catch up to speed. If you have 2 identical computers and one was started a week ago and one just now. You cannot compare the RAC of the 2 to arrive at the conclusion that the one started a week ago is faster than the one you started just now. Now, if it was 2 months from now, then yes you can compare the RAC values of the 2 machines.Mike,
http://web.archive.org/web/20120418125739/http://www.boinc-wiki.info/Recent_Average_Credit
If you started both at the same time then it would probably be OK for a comparison. I have one computer that is generating 10,000 credits per day but the RAC is only at 2.5k after 3~4 days.
What is the floating point benchmark score for the Zotac?
I don't really look at the RAC because it doesn't reach near the real value until a few weeks later. What I do is look at the completed tasks and average out the credits/hour and use this formula to calculate the number of credits per day: (credits/hour)*(#tasks running at any moment)*24hrs. The tasks typically run for either 4 or 8 hours so you can do credits/4hrs or 8hrs and modify the formula. Be sure the # of tasks are the ones actually running and does not include the ones being queued up.
You can see from my android device that I am getting roughly 50 credits per task every 4 hours and I am running 2 tasks at any given moment so my RAC should eventually be 100.
Yeah, I can't really tell anything yet about which CPU is most efficient. But, for example my phone (snapdragon 800 2.2ghz) and my - very slow - laptop (AMD e-450, 2x 1.65ghz) are getting about the same RAC I think, while I only use 1 core on my phone, and it's only processing when it's charging and above 90% battery (about 8 hours per day or something) and my laptop is processing full time on two cores. But I probably need a longer timeline before I can really say anything conclusive.Thats interesting the phone can do so well.
Anything we should be testing tomorrow Rob? When would you like me to set up the additional 7 sanctuaries? I have 3 activated at the moment.
Rob: your Ryzen is what ryzen 1700? and did only 250RAC for 24hours? .. how much RAM is need for ROSETTA? any help with 1core=1task? thanks guysLooks like its a ryzen 1700 8 core. I didnt tweak it to use 100% of the proc til this morning, so I started a new baseline with both this morning.
Yes, my last superblock payment was on block 7425.
And my magnitude is still decreasing.
Ok. I'm going to unhide my PCsIt looks that it won't be worthy to play with that in prod
