Bible Pay

Read 67060 times

  • Rob Andrews
  • Administrator

    • 2055


    • 28
    • June 05, 2017, 08:09:04 pm
    • Patmos, Island Of
    more
Re: BIBLEPAY - TESTNET THREAD - TESTING SANCTUARIES FOR GO LIVE AT CHRISTMAS
« Reply #270 on: November 17, 2017, 06:34:29 am »
all nodes on testnet are down except for 1 :
./biblepay-cli masternode list
{
  "04ca4bd54153476e6d19b72dc26bc27b74cdbbd687aea07c6cc1cd2182beab60-1": "ENABLED",
  "a23321871670924fa669c26284aeb9b36987d6bb3d7a590eaf2b5406b85201f4-1": "WATCHDOG_EXPIRED",
  "a27ae7dcc93df0ff266d2f11cb906f4929b7ad7d6b46bc98c192ac7998aa1058-1": "WATCHDOG_EXPIRED",
  "8ff3d83216612e2c79a36c5f66f191b34a07eb1d01600b104a76b3151de9e7f6-1": "WATCHDOG_EXPIRED",
  "78a235e8d3427b7fec1a0f3635cf3aeb2dbf7d0d53c44578815060d80280a271-1": "WATCHDOG_EXPIRED",
  "7b3873de1969b087f63cd287c64694b14250aecf7779c67f68691533a6616f3c-1": "NEW_START_REQUIRED",
  "d183b913e7a4b95c0202bf15d296e00bbdf0bedce317e340985a2c78af06cba4-1": "WATCHDOG_EXPIRED",
  "404f50700e2ffc8c4adb76bea92fb572584b1f3e24ec736d6883a64cc88417fb-1": "WATCHDOG_EXPIRED",
  "be3eaf8322909bbb150d89058bf261f0a2bf96369c8928313a3d69e2d5087add-1": "WATCHDOG_EXPIRED",
  "e413e134f7ecb6388ddfe401870f1e0ba602479abb8de8a5bf78c59c4087ee28-1": "NEW_START_REQUIRED",
  "b0cfdfa2194556e211099bc620a7e27487958aa5774db0c78ded0f839e3105d2-1": "NEW_START_REQUIRED",
  "c5a8405cbc39dd97004a64c1db586313ed25f3c4553ca59a0bdad30dd0c551d5-1": "NEW_START_REQUIRED",
  "44d550fef16c8bc5e340599cddbd6d98736218e1900f92b4625768e5830abfd0-1": "NEW_START_REQUIRED",
  "847be5b647856e9b030d785d7bc82f146362371a28663348e7a3d28df3e38c55-1": "WATCHDOG_EXPIRED"


I upgraded mine to 1.0.6    and after re-syncing it's showing "watchdog expired"   .  Watchdog is running with no errors. I didn't touch it.

  "78a235e8d3427b7fec1a0f3635cf3aeb2dbf7d0d53c44578815060d80280a271-1": "WATCHDOG_EXPIRED",

Well actually that masternode list in this case is just the view from your local node which is down, checking the masternode list, we have the same 5 ENABLED we had 20 hours ago (after the fork and after everyone restarted), so things are stll improving from that Point, but my guess is you havent actually recovered from that particular fork.

First you will have to sync and then work on the watchdog later.  mnsync status must show 999 before you can work on testing watchman.



  • Rob Andrews
  • Administrator

    • 2055


    • 28
    • June 05, 2017, 08:09:04 pm
    • Patmos, Island Of
    more
Re: BIBLEPAY - TESTNET THREAD - TESTING SANCTUARIES FOR GO LIVE AT CHRISTMAS
« Reply #271 on: November 17, 2017, 06:36:34 am »
ok,in controller wallet i BAN bad nodes and synced= all rewards received .... but linux masternode is stuck ... its need to resync masternode too?

what is command for reindex wallet in testnet i tried

./biblepay-cli -testnet -daemon -reindex
./biblepay-cli -testnet -reindex

and w/result

This isnt really a support thread on how to use the wallet.  Just resync your node and then lets continue testing sanctuaries.

EDIT: It looks like 95% of the network is at block 42122.  I see 65.x is resyncing.  Just try to get up to 42122+.

« Last Edit: November 17, 2017, 06:39:16 am by admin »


  • Rob Andrews
  • Administrator

    • 2055


    • 28
    • June 05, 2017, 08:09:04 pm
    • Patmos, Island Of
    more
Re: BIBLEPAY - TESTNET THREAD - TESTING SANCTUARIES FOR GO LIVE AT CHRISTMAS
« Reply #272 on: November 17, 2017, 06:59:24 am »
Just started a VM to try it and I also managed to get different biblehash!

Note: The mn4 machine above is running OpenSSL 101t while this one is running OpenSSL 102g

}
[email protected] ~ # biblepay-cli exec biblehash e0118ac9c4b5f6ec508e4bfefc38599fd55e7f79d108a560aeff9ceb0debc347 1510892191 1510890756 17074revheight 17111.000000 pindexPrev 20e9f4416b8e469b23a6fde82f197342086622e9ac827e78875701d001ca3916
2017-11-17 10:05:14 ERROR: CheckBlockHeader(): proof of work failed
2017-11-17 10:05:14 ERROR: ProcessNewBlock: CheckBlock FAILED
2017-11-17 10:05:14 Misbehaving: 97.99.69.33:40000 (0 -> 5)
2017-11-17 10:05:14 UpdateTip: new best=541a323bbf91103d90556af0e5b9143673a2cd36680fffe21bc3b7a9cbc85356  height=17112  log2_work=57.818294  tx=28819  date=2017-11-17 10:05:12 progress=1.000000  cache=0.0MiB(112tx)


Nice tests, thanks, you really gave a lot of data to work with and pretty much every condition LOL.

So Im going to make this my top priority today. 

On your question about re-running the biblehash command with a prior blocknumber parameter (the ones you noted 17069, same as 17079) etc, that is fine because the block number parameter being sent into the biblehash is only used for it to determine the chain height, to turn on or off f7000 or f8000, and that is enforced on all nodes so that is secure, so changing that between f7000 start and f8000 start will just give you the same exact biblehash, so that is OK.  Changing the lastblocktime is a similar issue: that only drives when the block becomes "late".  When the block time exceeds 30 minutes then and only then the hash changes, so that is OK too.

On the question regarding the if statement, which hash its using, in this last version 1060, it is actually checking both, first it says if biblehash1 is too high, then if biblehash2 is too high, so your log only yields errors where they both were high hashes.  But thats OK too, because you still exposed enough information.

However I wasnt sure if you had to run the cli command 10,000 times programatically to change the hash in your example because I ran one of your examples 125 times from my RPC and received the same hash every time so so far I have been unable to change the hash like you have, but dont worry, I have enough info from your log for something to go on.

But focusing in on the one where you show that the hash1 and hash2 are actually completely different now that is the big dog right there, that is the smoking gun, I have never seen that.  Imo, that rules out the math operator and math class, that was generated on 101t, so it "points" toward not being openSSL versioning, it really points to either the MD5 function 'caching' the prior result (from the last blockindex check), or the AES512 vector 'caching' the last result.  So I think today, Im going to hone in on making an alternate (compatible of course) biblehash, using a different md5 supplier and refactoring the AES512 call, and we can run that side by side, and see if something changes.





Re: BIBLEPAY - TESTNET THREAD - TESTING SANCTUARIES FOR GO LIVE AT CHRISTMAS
« Reply #273 on: November 17, 2017, 07:11:48 am »
Oh thanks for the clarifications!

I only have to do it maybe 10 times to get a different hash so it's pretty frequent.


Re: BIBLEPAY - TESTNET THREAD - TESTING SANCTUARIES FOR GO LIVE AT CHRISTMAS
« Reply #274 on: November 17, 2017, 07:14:49 am »
I just tried it again now. This is a straight copy and paste from my console with nothing before. It only took 1 try - well 2 I guess!

[email protected] ~ # biblepay-cli exec biblehash e0118ac9c4b5f6ec508e4bfefc38599fd55e7f79d108a560aeff9ceb0debc347 1510892191 1510890756 17075
{
  "Command": "biblehash",
  "BibleHash": "0000000000011c6f2cd7107900e4308d6db47227d9f1753e65b9d6fe206f3072"
}
[email protected] ~ # biblepay-cli exec biblehash e0118ac9c4b5f6ec508e4bfefc38599fd55e7f79d108a560aeff9ceb0debc347 1510892191 1510890756 17075
{
  "Command": "biblehash",
  "BibleHash": "0014bf432d9989ac1e7a93a8918e37b4aa9694f82fa3d86684a249f2c444394d"
}
[email protected] ~ # biblepay-cli exec biblehash e0118ac9c4b5f6ec508e4bfefc38599fd55e7f79d108a560aeff9ceb0debc347 1510892191 1510890756 17075
{
  "Command": "biblehash",
  "BibleHash": "0000000000011c6f2cd7107900e4308d6db47227d9f1753e65b9d6fe206f3072"
}


Re: BIBLEPAY - TESTNET THREAD - TESTING SANCTUARIES FOR GO LIVE AT CHRISTMAS
« Reply #275 on: November 17, 2017, 07:39:37 am »
Oh also and I may have misunderstood you. Since everything is the same but the prev block number, shouldn't these hashes be the same?

[email protected] ~ # biblepay-cli exec biblehash e0118ac9c4b5f6ec508e4bfefc38599fd55e7f79d108a560aeff9ceb0debc347 1510892191 1510890756 17079
{
  "Command": "biblehash",
  "BibleHash": "0000000000002aaa46b9dc122688a0e203a7ddec60b104c95c0f1372eb43e0dd"
}
[email protected] ~ # biblepay-cli exec biblehash e0118ac9c4b5f6ec508e4bfefc38599fd55e7f79d108a560aeff9ceb0debc347 1510892191 1510890756 17078
{
  "Command": "biblehash",
  "BibleHash": "0000000000011c6f2cd7107900e4308d6db47227d9f1753e65b9d6fe206f3072"

[email protected] ~ # biblepay-cli exec biblehash e0118ac9c4b5f6ec508e4bfefc38599fd55e7f79d108a560aeff9ceb0debc347 1510892191 1510890756 17069
{
  "Command": "biblehash",
  "BibleHash": "0000000000002aaa46b9dc122688a0e203a7ddec60b104c95c0f1372eb43e0dd"


Re: BIBLEPAY - TESTNET THREAD - TESTING SANCTUARIES FOR GO LIVE AT CHRISTMAS
« Reply #276 on: November 17, 2017, 08:24:14 am »
Hey Klondike,

I created a thread there. Can you post what issue you're having again? I will do my best to help you.

http://forum.biblepay.org/index.php?topic=38.0


  • Rob Andrews
  • Administrator

    • 2055


    • 28
    • June 05, 2017, 08:09:04 pm
    • Patmos, Island Of
    more
Re: BIBLEPAY - TESTNET THREAD - TESTING SANCTUARIES FOR GO LIVE AT CHRISTMAS
« Reply #277 on: November 17, 2017, 08:56:02 am »
  im deleted chain+blocks ans im back  ...

question: how long being when status WATCHDOG changed to ENABLED from WATCH_DOG EXPIRED?

thanks

There are multiple layers of issues when you resync. When you have been synced for 24+ hours, if you had a watchdog problem, watchman would update the database and the gui and the votes in 15 minutes.  When you re-sync, your mncache.dat file is hosed and it takes about 6 hours to fix itself.

Lets just ensure your watchman command returns empty, and then wait for something to change once you are synced.  If not fixed in 8 hours something is wrong.



  • Rob Andrews
  • Administrator

    • 2055


    • 28
    • June 05, 2017, 08:09:04 pm
    • Patmos, Island Of
    more
Re: BIBLEPAY - TESTNET THREAD - TESTING SANCTUARIES FOR GO LIVE AT CHRISTMAS
« Reply #278 on: November 17, 2017, 08:57:57 am »
Oh also and I may have misunderstood you. Since everything is the same but the prev block number, shouldn't these hashes be the same?

[email protected] ~ # biblepay-cli exec biblehash e0118ac9c4b5f6ec508e4bfefc38599fd55e7f79d108a560aeff9ceb0debc347 1510892191 1510890756 17079
{
  "Command": "biblehash",
  "BibleHash": "0000000000002aaa46b9dc122688a0e203a7ddec60b104c95c0f1372eb43e0dd"
}
[email protected] ~ # biblepay-cli exec biblehash e0118ac9c4b5f6ec508e4bfefc38599fd55e7f79d108a560aeff9ceb0debc347 1510892191 1510890756 17078
{
  "Command": "biblehash",
  "BibleHash": "0000000000011c6f2cd7107900e4308d6db47227d9f1753e65b9d6fe206f3072"

[email protected] ~ # biblepay-cli exec biblehash e0118ac9c4b5f6ec508e4bfefc38599fd55e7f79d108a560aeff9ceb0debc347 1510892191 1510890756 17069
{
  "Command": "biblehash",
  "BibleHash": "0000000000002aaa46b9dc122688a0e203a7ddec60b104c95c0f1372eb43e0dd"

Yes, they should be the same - all 3 of them should be the same since only the last parameter is changing, the correct hash is 2aaa in prod - Im running it now in the rpc.  The 11c6 hash is a bad hash.   That looks like the problem.  Its interesting you can generate those hashes so easily.  Would you say that the type of node you are testing on in prod is a very, very slow node with very low ram, or is it a super machine running many threads with a lot of ram?



Re: BIBLEPAY - TESTNET THREAD - TESTING SANCTUARIES FOR GO LIVE AT CHRISTMAS
« Reply #279 on: November 17, 2017, 09:01:02 am »
All the "mn" nodes are Ryzen 7 with 64gb of DDR4 and 2xSSDs in Raid0. So decent machines I think!


  • klondike
  • Full Member

    • 189


    • -10
    • October 10, 2017, 09:00:24 am
    more
Re: BIBLEPAY - TESTNET THREAD - TESTING SANCTUARIES FOR GO LIVE AT CHRISTMAS
« Reply #280 on: November 17, 2017, 09:16:42 am »
Rob



1.how long being when status WATCHDOG changed to ENABLED from WATCH_DOG EXPIRED when watchman run?
2.where i can see that watcham is running?

3.PRE-ENABLED : watchman doesnt running,right?
« Last Edit: November 17, 2017, 09:23:18 am by klondike »


  • Rob Andrews
  • Administrator

    • 2055


    • 28
    • June 05, 2017, 08:09:04 pm
    • Patmos, Island Of
    more
Re: BIBLEPAY - TESTNET THREAD - TESTING SANCTUARIES FOR GO LIVE AT CHRISTMAS
« Reply #281 on: November 17, 2017, 09:17:38 am »
All the "mn" nodes are Ryzen 7 with 64gb of DDR4 and 2xSSDs in Raid0. So decent machines I think!
Thats very interesting.  Im honestly thinking, the Ryzen processor may be so fast that one mining thread is loading the AES512 encryption key partially in the core while the other receives a hash based on a faulty encryption key.  I did find a circumstance where I believe that is possible, so all this effort is definitely worth it, as this will "potentially" give us a stable biblehash, if this is the problem.

Ok, I tested the new version to ensure it yields the same hashes and mines in prod and testnet so I am checking it in.
Please grab 1061.

In this version, we use a different call to openssl's md5 (IE directly from the biblehash lib), we change our call to AES512 to be more efficient, and we set up a few miningparams once before we mine to not require those calls for every hash (so thats a slight improvement there too).  The biggest change, the one that might make or break this as the fix, is this:  I found the bibleminer was re-loading the encryption key for every hash, and that could be the problem.  I fixed this! So lets go ahead and try it again and see if it fixes.



  • Rob Andrews
  • Administrator

    • 2055


    • 28
    • June 05, 2017, 08:09:04 pm
    • Patmos, Island Of
    more
Re: BIBLEPAY - TESTNET THREAD - TESTING SANCTUARIES FOR GO LIVE AT CHRISTMAS
« Reply #282 on: November 17, 2017, 09:19:30 am »
Rob

1.how long being when status WATCHDOG changed to ENABLED from WATCH_DOG EXPIRED when watchman run?
2.where i can see that watcham is running?

3.RE-ENABLED : watchman doesnt running,right?
1) If you delete your Watchman.db database and re-sync masternode data, and clear all your sanctuary .dat files (like mncache), then 15 minues, otherwise 8 hours.
2) You run watchman from the command line and see if it returns empty string.
3) Depends, if you just synced, you have to do queries in the watchman database to find the answer.


Re: BIBLEPAY - TESTNET THREAD - TESTING SANCTUARIES FOR GO LIVE AT CHRISTMAS
« Reply #283 on: November 17, 2017, 09:20:26 am »
Alright, I'm compiling the new version now. The "snapshot" node is a small vm with 2 core and 4gb of ram. I also had VMs with 1 core and 512 mb of ram and I have noticed the same issue.


  • Rob Andrews
  • Administrator

    • 2055


    • 28
    • June 05, 2017, 08:09:04 pm
    • Patmos, Island Of
    more
Re: BIBLEPAY - TESTNET THREAD - TESTING SANCTUARIES FOR GO LIVE AT CHRISTMAS
« Reply #284 on: November 17, 2017, 09:29:57 am »
im still PRE-ENABLED  ... shit


by me,this masternodes is PONZI SCHEME like BBP : and i screw on all masternodes..... still not exists guide why watchman doesant running stable,im do all by guide and ROB=ADMIN still wrote with puzzles

ASKING YOU : how long being when you start WATCHMAN and your STATUS in controller wallet changes from preenabled to enabled? immediately?


i hope that masternodes wont be exists on BBP,cos this setuping is massacer

Dude its obvious you have a bad attitude and I dont want it here, why dont you try dash out for a while and see how easy it is to set one up and then come back later and tell us how it went?