Bible Pay

Read 12607 times

  • MIP
  • Developer

    • 239


    • 27
    • February 13, 2018, 11:55:52 AM
    more
Re: TestNet - PODC 2.0 (Proof of Distributed Computing)
« Reply #315 on: December 01, 2019, 01:58:37 PM »
BiblePay
1.4.8.3 - Leisure Upgrade for TestNet

- Fix bug preventing syncing from 0
- Fix 'exec rac' PODC transmission height
- Enhance 'exec sentgsc' to allow a CPK parameter to audit sent gscs by CPK
- Fix bug ensuring that unbanked cpids are included in the GSC
- Add warning when user executes sendgscc, if coin-age is low, that PODC rewards will be reduced.  Also add a warning to exec rac .

** This is the windows & self-compiled release **

Testnet MacOS and Linux binaries also available

So far I could associate the user and everything went smoothly

I will wait for some blocks to run exec rac and post results
« Last Edit: December 02, 2019, 11:46:07 AM by Rob Andrews »


  • togoshigekata
  • Sr. Member

    • 485


    • 25
    • September 01, 2017, 10:21:10 AM
    • USA
    more
Re: TestNet - PODC 2.0 (Proof of Distributed Computing)
« Reply #316 on: December 02, 2019, 01:21:18 PM »
What is the correct chain?

I have 3 nodes on block 19600

getblockhash 19600
cc6e4******137806

I kept trying to get another node to sync up to that, but it kept syncing to block 17444 or so,
even when I deleted everything in the data folder twice, and did addnodes for oncoapops IPs
https://oncoapop.sdf.org/biblepaytest/testnet_chainstate.shtml

Ill try again


  • togoshigekata
  • Sr. Member

    • 485


    • 25
    • September 01, 2017, 10:21:10 AM
    • USA
    more
Re: TestNet - PODC 2.0 (Proof of Distributed Computing)
« Reply #317 on: December 02, 2019, 02:43:42 PM »
Happened again, only got to block 17444
Im updating to v1.4.8.3
Ok that worked, Im synced up now!


  • Rob Andrews
  • Administrator

    • 2275


    • 29
    • June 05, 2017, 08:09:04 PM
    • Patmos, Island Of
    more
Re: TestNet - PODC 2.0 (Proof of Distributed Computing)
« Reply #318 on: December 02, 2019, 02:47:12 PM »
Happened again, only got to block 17444
Im updating to v1.4.8.3
Ok that worked, Im synced up now!

Yeah, 1.4.8.2 didnt support syncing from 0, but 1.4.8.3 does.



  • Rob Andrews
  • Administrator

    • 2275


    • 29
    • June 05, 2017, 08:09:04 PM
    • Patmos, Island Of
    more
Re: TestNet - PODC 2.0 (Proof of Distributed Computing)
« Reply #319 on: December 02, 2019, 03:11:44 PM »
Happened again, only got to block 17444
Im updating to v1.4.8.3
Ok that worked, Im synced up now!

Btw, did you get paid for the Kanye proposal?



  • togoshigekata
  • Sr. Member

    • 485


    • 25
    • September 01, 2017, 10:21:10 AM
    • USA
    more
Re: TestNet - PODC 2.0 (Proof of Distributed Computing)
« Reply #320 on: December 02, 2019, 03:26:38 PM »
I do not believe I received the Kanye proposal funding,
I just created another proposal, should show up soon

===

All 3 nodes are running PrivateSend now

Im seeing this, havent seen any mixing yet:
https://i.imgur.com/FXI92Y3.png


  • togoshigekata
  • Sr. Member

    • 485


    • 25
    • September 01, 2017, 10:21:10 AM
    • USA
    more
Re: TestNet - PODC 2.0 (Proof of Distributed Computing)
« Reply #321 on: December 02, 2019, 04:38:26 PM »
Im testing Dynamic Whale Staking, I just ran:

Code: [Select]
exec dws 100000 3 I_AGREE yXfpgvjvNJ5aURRQ6porVHSPJzWdiWvk9i
The DWU is 91.1005, does that mean I multiple by 1.0911005 to calculate what I will receive back?

DWS Reference: https://forum.biblepay.org/index.php?topic=468.0



  • sunk818
  • Sr. Member

    • 329


    • 11
    • April 24, 2018, 02:02:20 PM
Re: TestNet - PODC 2.0 (Proof of Distributed Computing)
« Reply #322 on: December 02, 2019, 04:38:57 PM »
I do not believe I received the Kanye proposal funding,
I just created another proposal, should show up soon

===

All 3 nodes are running PrivateSend now

Im seeing this, havent seen any mixing yet:
https://i.imgur.com/FXI92Y3.png


I think we should get rid of PrivateSend. Who uses PrivateSend besides you? If many of the BBP features are based on coin age, PrivateSend mixing conflicts with those features (e.g. PoDC 2.0, Healing, PoG/Dynamic Whale Staking). How much development and support time is spent on this feature while the percentage of use is extremely low? If God knows everything we do, what do we need to keep private/obfuscated on the blockchain?


  • togoshigekata
  • Sr. Member

    • 485


    • 25
    • September 01, 2017, 10:21:10 AM
    • USA
    more
Re: TestNet - PODC 2.0 (Proof of Distributed Computing)
« Reply #323 on: December 02, 2019, 05:16:31 PM »
I do not believe I received the Kanye proposal funding,
I just created another proposal, should show up soon

I believe I was looking at the wrong wallet,
I see that I received 1 million BBP at address: yVqyMZPPUw6JrASEgfWsRns7rDkRQFQbVF
on 11/28/19 00:20, Height: 18655


  • Rob Andrews
  • Administrator

    • 2275


    • 29
    • June 05, 2017, 08:09:04 PM
    • Patmos, Island Of
    more
Re: TestNet - PODC 2.0 (Proof of Distributed Computing)
« Reply #324 on: December 02, 2019, 06:26:26 PM »
I believe I was looking at the wrong wallet,
I see that I received 1 million BBP at address: yVqyMZPPUw6JrASEgfWsRns7rDkRQFQbVF
on 11/28/19 00:20, Height: 18655

Good, thats the one I reentered.  Im fairly certain Watchman is working, because it is the same code ported over from prod.
So Im relatively sure superblocks are going to work.

Ill enter another extra proposal now.



  • Rob Andrews
  • Administrator

    • 2275


    • 29
    • June 05, 2017, 08:09:04 PM
    • Patmos, Island Of
    more
Re: TestNet - PODC 2.0 (Proof of Distributed Computing)
« Reply #325 on: December 02, 2019, 06:33:34 PM »
Im testing Dynamic Whale Staking, I just ran:

Code: [Select]
exec dws 100000 3 I_AGREE yXfpgvjvNJ5aURRQ6porVHSPJzWdiWvk9i
The DWU is 91.1005, does that mean I multiple by 1.0911005 to calculate what I will receive back?

DWS Reference: https://forum.biblepay.org/index.php?topic=468.0

So just to clarify, we use Dynamic Whale Units so as to not make any promise of a return in standard banking terms, IE this is more of a staking term.
Another thing to clarify, note that if the screen quote (from exec dws) shows DWU 95 for 30 days), your actual DWU (of 91.1005 above) is based on '3 days' and that is derived from the 30 day duration (we get less DWU for shorter burns, more DWU for longer, and even much more as you can see for locking up for 365 days). 

So to calculate the stake reward you can multiply .911005 * original burn divided by 365 (annualize it) * the duration in days, and that is the Dynamic whale reward amount (plus the original burn amount).

Also you can type 'exec dwsquote 1 1' to see your own burns, with details containing the future maturity date and total calculated amount.


Hey guys, lets test at least 10 burns each if possible, put in an easy to use suffix on the amount like '10001.10' '10002.20' or whatever you prefer and you will easily see you get back 10 in the future- i recommend doing shorter terms because we only have 15 more days of testing left.

« Last Edit: December 02, 2019, 06:35:07 PM by Rob Andrews »


  • togoshigekata
  • Sr. Member

    • 485


    • 25
    • September 01, 2017, 10:21:10 AM
    • USA
    more
Re: TestNet - PODC 2.0 (Proof of Distributed Computing)
« Reply #326 on: December 02, 2019, 06:37:58 PM »
Thank you for explaining DWS Rob, I think its a cool feature (I like HEX coin)

I think I got confused from this example on the DWS proposal thread:
https://forum.biblepay.org/index.php?topic=468.0

Quote
getdwsquote
Amount staked: 1,000,000
Dynamic-whale-unit reward: 15
This means the user would potentially receive 15000 bbp in reward one year after the coins are burned.

15,000 should be 150,000?


  • Rob Andrews
  • Administrator

    • 2275


    • 29
    • June 05, 2017, 08:09:04 PM
    • Patmos, Island Of
    more
Re: TestNet - PODC 2.0 (Proof of Distributed Computing)
« Reply #327 on: December 02, 2019, 06:42:26 PM »
I do not believe I received the Kanye proposal funding,
I just created another proposal, should show up soon

===

All 3 nodes are running PrivateSend now

Im seeing this, havent seen any mixing yet:
https://i.imgur.com/FXI92Y3.png

Well on a side note I do recommend using a dedicated wallet for mixing; we definitely should not ask the user to intermingle the CPK PODC wallet with the PS inputs/outputs as I think that will just be asking for trouble.  If you could please test this in a wallet that you are not testing the 'exec rac' on that would be very helpful.

I think your PS might be working now; its showing that out of the 7 nodes, 3 are willing to mix.
That means if you let it run for a while (try the command line, privatesend start)?  see if it mixes over night.
We increased the denoms by 100* so it should consume less bills now.



  • Rob Andrews
  • Administrator

    • 2275


    • 29
    • June 05, 2017, 08:09:04 PM
    • Patmos, Island Of
    more
Re: TestNet - PODC 2.0 (Proof of Distributed Computing)
« Reply #328 on: December 02, 2019, 06:46:03 PM »
Thank you for explaining DWS Rob, I think its a cool feature (I like HEX coin)

I think I got confused from this example on the DWS proposal thread:
https://forum.biblepay.org/index.php?topic=468.0

15,000 should be 150,000?
Oh sorry, your exactly right - it should have been 150K.  I edited it in 2 places just now.

Is HEX very similar to this feature?  And did they also make it staking so they can be howy compliant?



  • togoshigekata
  • Sr. Member

    • 485


    • 25
    • September 01, 2017, 10:21:10 AM
    • USA
    more
Re: TestNet - PODC 2.0 (Proof of Distributed Computing)
« Reply #329 on: December 02, 2019, 06:59:35 PM »
This is HEX telegram bot response to howey:
https://pastebin.com/h7k9PM4A

Theyre about to launch pretty soon, was supposed to go live already an hour ago,
I plan to put $150 of Ethereum into it today, and then sign (prove) I own Bitcoin tomorrow,
and then I plan to stake the coins for 6 years LOL

I dont mean to advertise, and I have no idea if it will go up in value,
but Im a fan of Richard Hearts youtube videos,
even though he can be a bit harsh and I disagree with him on some things,
(before this he really wanted to make a science coin and then gave up b/c it was too hard,
I think he put a good amount of time into it, it was called CFD token (CFD for Computational Fluid Dynamics))