So how do you respond in love to a disrespectful person like the snat? Do you see that he doesnt deserve the answers? These are not loving questions, they are attacks from a disrespectful person.
What do you mean that a miner who mined for a sanc has less voting power than an investor? Hogwash. I mined this coin with more than 35 servers and bought sancs on the open market. Yes, they are both valuable for voting.
Again, you don't know that the supermajority is voting no, because you don't have an accurate vote count from me (which I established earlier). You are now believing your lies, and I have the credibility here - Sorry, but you lost your credibility with your corrosive attitude, disrespect, and inaccurate hacking attempts. Its not your business which masternode keys you made a mistake on, but its definitely true that more than a N number exist that I set up that are voting that appear to come from my account but arent really my sancs... So knowing that you made an error, why dont you come clean and tell everyone the truth, that you are publicizing a lie?
(LOL, without naming names, I set a couple up for one of our directors, some for a person that is actually in this thread, and I helped someone via e-mail with a certain number, a lot has gone through my wallet, therefore you don't really know out of my N sancs how many are voting right now, you dont know. You might be off by quite a large number !)
From the looks of the poll here, it looks like the non-Biblepay team miners want this to pass also.
The main issue I think that exists is the Sancs in question all tend to vote at the same time. So Occam's razor would say one entity controls them all. While it is certainly possible you run sanc's for other users (and good for you because some people have difficulty or lack of time to figure it out) and it is possible you either 1) asked them how they want to vote and they all said "yes" or 2) more likely told you to vote their sanc's with yours, the result is still the same. It appears from normal block-chain analysis (and not any black-hat hacker activity) that you control the super majority of normally voting sancs.
I'm not asking personally how many you own, and it is your right to keep that private. But as the lead dev of the coin, that sort of transparency would build trust in the greater crypto community.
While you are certainly within your rights to use your sanc's (and any sanc's the owners have given de facto proxy to you) how you see fit regardless of if they were bought or earned, the question of how many sanc's you control is certainly a valid one for most users. Because in the end, if you control a supermajority, there are questions of if we have true governance. That is not to say that anyone with the resources to buy up BBP (and now seems to be a great time) couldn't exceed what you are believed to control. Nor is to say you haven't earned the right to call some shots. But until the Foundation is up and running, it seems like going over and above to preserve trust would have more of a impact on the price of the coin and it's future than any feature that could be added.
In closing, the request of some in the community, and one you're free to choose what to do with, is to reduce the voting of the sanc's you control to a level where you can not pass or fail any proposal on your own. One simple formula would be to vote with a number no more than 10% of the total sanc's, which would reduce any perceived control you have over the governance system.
Regardless of what direction you go, know that most of the community still trusts you and are thankful for how far you've gotten this coin in such a short time.
Poll