Bible Pay

Read 66285 times

  • jaapgvk
  • Hero Member

    • 617


    • 31
    • September 01, 2017, 08:02:57 pm
    • Netherlands
    more
Re: BIBLEPAY - TESTNET THREAD - TESTING SANCTUARIES FOR GO LIVE AT CHRISTMAS
« Reply #600 on: March 02, 2018, 05:22:02 am »
Haha, great to see that you've solved your own problems ;D

Yes, I think the MN will be enabled soon.


  • MIP
  • Developer

    • 228


    • 26
    • February 13, 2018, 11:55:52 am
    more
Re: BIBLEPAY - TESTNET THREAD - TESTING SANCTUARIES FOR GO LIVE AT CHRISTMAS
« Reply #601 on: March 02, 2018, 05:24:36 am »
Haha, great to see that you've solved your own problems ;D

Yes, I think the MN will be enabled soon.

There is always a first time for everything my friend.


  • jaapgvk
  • Hero Member

    • 617


    • 31
    • September 01, 2017, 08:02:57 pm
    • Netherlands
    more
Re: BIBLEPAY - TESTNET THREAD - TESTING SANCTUARIES FOR GO LIVE AT CHRISTMAS
« Reply #602 on: March 02, 2018, 06:22:38 am »
There is always a first time for everything my friend.

Very true, I learn every day :)


  • jaapgvk
  • Hero Member

    • 617


    • 31
    • September 01, 2017, 08:02:57 pm
    • Netherlands
    more
Re: BIBLEPAY - TESTNET THREAD - TESTING SANCTUARIES FOR GO LIVE AT CHRISTMAS
« Reply #603 on: April 07, 2018, 04:18:03 am »
Is there  a reason the MN payments have plummeted?  I understand there is a variation based on time to solve the block, but when PoDC came about, the payments and timing issues seemed solved for the most part.  Yet today, the MN payments seem more than 10% below what the average had been and are trending towards to an under 4000 / payment level when before they were trending to a just under 5000 / payment level.  There is not a lot of data to look at yet, so maybe I'm getting ahead of things, but the root question is has anything been changed in the last two or three days that would impact this or am I just hitting a run of poor luck?

https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=2388064.msg34061945#msg34061945

Don't know if this is a definitive answer, but it's what I think is the case.