Bible Pay

Show Posts

This section allows you to view all posts made by this member. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to.


Messages - thesnat21

Pages: 1 2 3 4 [5] 6 7 8 9 10 11
61
TestNet Discussion Archive / Re: Testnet - Test Proof of Giving
« on: December 15, 2018, 06:30:53 am »
Ok, Testnet seems stuck at block 87697

62
TestNet Discussion Archive / Re: Testnet - Test Proof of Giving
« on: December 14, 2018, 12:50:25 pm »
restarted mine..

Having issues getting peers however, is the main node up?

63
Archived Proposals / Re: Use Discourse as Main Forum
« on: December 14, 2018, 08:27:44 am »
I agree on almost all of the above points and discourse doesnt look too bad, especially if PIVX uses it.

Im neutral on this subject- so I think we should let thesnat weight in more on this as I feel we would be pushing the lions share of work over to him if we switch to discourse.  (Especially if he is willing to be hosting the forum etc).  He might be working on POG PHP pages, or proposal enhancements, or wanting to run a copy of dashninja (we should consider calling that BiblePayRabbi if we ever do that) etc.  I would like to see how he would like to spend his next 6 month time.  If he wants to push this off and still do it later please let us know Snat.

It's on my list.. not the highest priority (Working building out the web toolset.  BiblepayRabbi is an interesting name, but I thought the term was reserved for Jewish teachers...  We need something scholarly but biblical.. )

I do think it will help adoption, I will work on it as I need distractions/mental breaks from my main tasks. 

Apparently there is a conversion script available, I will look into it more.

64
Archived Proposals / Re: Use Togo's Bitcointalk ANN Redesign
« on: December 13, 2018, 11:04:12 am »
To be clear, I think the content of the main post in togo's ann thread is what he wants moved to the main ANN
not replace the existing ANN altogether.

65
Archived Proposals / Re: Use Discourse as Main Forum
« on: December 13, 2018, 11:03:07 am »
As I have time I will look into moving over.  I think the added features will be a benefit.

66
Archived Proposals / Re: Use Discourse as Main Forum
« on: December 12, 2018, 05:44:19 am »
Another strong reason for Discourse is the ability to review changes in the post:
https://meta.discourse.org/t/everyone-can-view-post-change-history/7639

Production Proposals were/are being treated as Preproduction Proposals with changes to the proposal text diverging from the original intent of the proposal. I believe this practice is wrong and we should follow IT best practices such as having different environments dev/test -> QA -> production. Same with proposals. If the proposal is not well formed, it should be discussed in pre-production proposal. But if proposals in production must be edited, at least Discourse gives the feature where you can compare the original post with subsequent revisions. Its not perfect, but changes can be followed which I think is a more honest approach.

I don't see any downside to using Discourse and only upside.

my only concern is SEO, and there should be some plan to perform 301 redirects of old urls to equal URLs in Discourse:
https://www.google.com/search?q=site%3Aforum.biblepay.org

Agreed on the 301,  this is important.. not sure the best way to do that yet, but will figure something out.

67
Thanks Rob! I hope that you are doing well. You are in my thoughts.

I just realized something really stupid! In the spreadsheet I didn't yet factor in the leftover BBP from the airdrop and the hardcopy guide budget. (I'm not the most organized person in the world :p) That in total is about 340k BBP. See the threads here:
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=2388064.msg46567668#msg46567668
https://forum.biblepay.org/index.php?topic=120.msg4568#msg4568

Let's cross that off against each other and call it a day.

So please everyone: downvote my proposal for this month! As far as I'm concerned I'm compensated enough for the coinexchange listing.

Wow thanks for the update, glad it worked out!

Don't forget us while you're away Jaap! :)

68
Thank you for your efforts keeping Kairos going!


69
TestNet Discussion Archive / Re: Testnet - Test Proof of Giving
« on: December 11, 2018, 12:42:25 pm »
We are not supposed to have any dependencies on dash.org. It must be some remnant left behind on the contrib/depends files. But this didn't show up on mainnet PPA, and nothing has changed about that on 1.1.6.3 from 1.1.6.1.

I'll check it.

Odd...  I removed the dashd repo and it lets me install.

70
TestNet Discussion Archive / Re: Testnet - Test Proof of Giving
« on: December 11, 2018, 11:24:14 am »
Testnet packages ready

sudo add-apt-repository ppa:biblepay-official/testnet
sudo apt-get update

I'm assuming the repository wont work for bionic? :)

Err:11 http://ppa.launchpad.net/dash.org/dash/ubuntu bionic Release
  404  Not Found [IP: 91.189.95.83 80]
Reading package lists... Done
E: The repository 'http://ppa.launchpad.net/dash.org/dash/ubuntu bionic Release' does not have a Release file.
N: Updating from such a repository can't be done securely, and is therefore disabled by default.
N: See apt-secure(8) manpage for repository creation and user configuration details.


71
TestNet Discussion Archive / Re: Testnet - Test Proof of Giving
« on: December 11, 2018, 06:19:05 am »
I know we have a small sampling size, but this still seems odd, how are we ending up duplicating tiers so easily?

Also, i'm curious what happens when a tier is empty  the rewards just go to the miner?

"0": "Count: 0, Total: 0.0000",
  "1": "Count: 0, Total: 0.0000",
  "2": "Count: 0, Total: 0.0000",
  "3": "Count: 0, Total: 0.0000",
  "4": "Count: 0, Total: 0.0000",
  "5": "Count: 2, Total: 4054.0000",
  "6": "Count: 0, Total: 0.0000",
  "7": "Count: 0, Total: 0.0000",
  "8": "Count: 2, Total: 1450.0000",
  "9": "Count: 0, Total: 0.0000",
  "10": "Count: 0, Total: 0.0000",
  "11": "Count: 0, Total: 0.0000",
  "12": "Count: 2, Total: 3567.0000",
  "13": "Count: 1, Total: 869.0000",
  "14": "Count: 0, Total: 0.0000",
  "15": "Count: 0, Total: 0.0000",

72
TestNet Discussion Archive / Re: Testnet - Test Proof of Giving
« on: December 09, 2018, 06:15:17 pm »
I did plan on thinking about a couple more controls also, like the tithe frequency.  They definiately should be able to override the default spork (which is 1 hr in testnet) by doing something like 'tithefrequency=86400' which would be equal to one day.

Let me know if you think of other controls, but we dont want to make it too complicated either. 


EDIT:

So for prod, I propose:

Default - if nothing set:
tithing=false
tithefrequency=spork_value_set_by_biblepay_devs

If a user sets them:

tithing=true
tithefrequency=Seconds_between_send


TitheCap:  Equal to 70% of our monthly POBH heat emissions (This gives miners a minimum of 30% profit on any day, and an unlimited max profit on a slow day)

Scope:  To expand POBH only for a few months, then we re-evaluate the impact this system made on bringing new users in the house.

Fair enough,  I think we need a button in the UI that will adjust the config and/or make it a registry option for those using the qt wallet.

I'm reluctant to add too much to the current QT gui with the rebase in the background ...  But for "ease of use" controlling the mining activities from the UI is important.

I'll poke around with it a bit more to see what else I can come up with

73
TestNet Discussion Archive / Re: Testnet - Test Proof of Giving
« on: December 09, 2018, 02:18:05 pm »
I think we need to work out some UI controls for tithing..

I don't believe it should be auto-on.   Though this makes for easy participation I feel the user should intentionally start this process (or risk people thinking we're a scam / stealing coins).

Klondike: i'll talk with you on IM,  I think you are expecting more than is required.

74
General Support / Re: BiblePay Central historic and Wallet not matching
« on: December 09, 2018, 07:21:37 am »
Put your CPID in here:
https://forum.biblepay.org/tools/podcstatus.php

This will tell you what the final payments were.

75
TestNet Discussion Archive / Re: Testnet - Test Proof of Giving
« on: December 08, 2018, 03:41:18 pm »
I've sent quite a bit of coin to the foundation, its only seeing 897, but have sent over 3k

Also, i'm curious with things so sparse, why am I lumped in tier #4 w/ another?




{
  "Command": "pogpool",
  "yNkUU4v33Y7je144SsjcibR5ULr8eviUVd": "Amount: 794.00, Weight: 1.0000, Payment_Tier: 15, Height: 83583, Address: yNkUU4v33Y7je144SsjcibR5ULr8eviUVd, NickName: slovakia",
  "ySwRWw1EEEMyGSz4iiWVAwryXbxBTumiPG": "Amount: 1009.00, Weight: 1.0000, Payment_Tier: 5, Height: 83493, Address: ySwRWw1EEEMyGSz4iiWVAwryXbxBTumiPG, NickName: randrews",
  "yaSJ9FdsPcQvGjyrzxVFUPjg6wkJBQwaxc": "Amount: 891.00, Weight: 0.6222, Payment_Tier: 4, Height: 83540, Address: yaSJ9FdsPcQvGjyrzxVFUPjg6wkJBQwaxc, NickName: thesnat1",
  "ydXPSPFWeoA9RUQoX6uBKmjnnJV6GxfwBa": "Amount: 255.00, Weight: 1.0000, Payment_Tier: 7, Height: 83415, Address: ydXPSPFWeoA9RUQoX6uBKmjnnJV6GxfwBa, NickName: jerky",
  "ygEXbdJhypUaVhYo5Q2jKATctQtVWL892K": "Amount: 541.00, Weight: 0.3778, Payment_Tier: 4, Height: 83540, Address: ygEXbdJhypUaVhYo5Q2jKATctQtVWL892K, NickName: slybaby",
  "0": "Count: 0, Total: 0.0000",
  "1": "Count: 0, Total: 0.0000",
  "2": "Count: 0, Total: 0.0000",
  "3": "Count: 0, Total: 0.0000",
  "4": "Count: 2, Total: 1432.0000",
  "5": "Count: 1, Total: 1009.0000",
  "6": "Count: 0, Total: 0.0000",
  "7": "Count: 1, Total: 255.0000",
  "8": "Count: 0, Total: 0.0000",
  "9": "Count: 0, Total: 0.0000",
  "10": "Count: 0, Total: 0.0000",
  "11": "Count: 0, Total: 0.0000",
  "12": "Count: 0, Total: 0.0000",
  "13": "Count: 0, Total: 0.0000",
  "14": "Count: 0, Total: 0.0000",
  "15": "Count: 1, Total: 794.0000",
  "High Tithe": 1009,
  "My Tithes": 891.42,
  "My Payment Height": 83585
}


Pages: 1 2 3 4 [5] 6 7 8 9 10 11