Let's break this up into pieces.
No Staking for Mag < 1: Right now that our RAC is 7,566,293 (that is effective RAC, since some RAC is not staked at 100%). Our real RAC is 3,792,636 WCG and 5,609,297 R@h for an total of 11,298,251. I'm going to use the secondary figure as if we're trying to boost our users we should get there pretty fast. That means right now 1 MAG = 11,300 RAC. That is a pretty smoking home system or a weak two processor Xeon server. I don't believe it's fair to say that someone that has a Threadrippper or a Dual-Processor Server is suddenly going to start mining BBP because they can do it without staking. Additionally, if we did double the number of miners, you'd get to the point where a high end server no longer needs staking. There are alternatives, people can PoDC without stake at BBPPool.com. The Airdrop will enable most average home users to PoDC at near 100% without changing the system. Additionally given the cheating that occurred with likely botnets, and the ease at which one could run multiple instances on a single server, this effectively means anyone with the technical skill and the desire to get ahead will not have to stake. That staking will then flow into Sanctuaries or flood the market, both of which hurt the coin (decreasing ROI for Sanctuaries or increased downward price pressure).
Team Removal: Right now our Team Stats are incredible. That we've not been able to capitalize on that is a shame, although I'm as clueless as anyone why that is. So if we remove our team requirement then nearly every power user will migrate to GRC and double dip with BBP. The same way some of us are double dipping with Byteball. I can say with 100% certainty, me personally double dipping with Byteball has done very little for them, short of the fact I've shared it several times with others. So I'm actually taking away from the return of people that legitimately support the coin. The only way this is somewhat beneficial is if the Staking requirements stay the same. Then we likely gain a few new users from GRC who buy BBP to Stake with, providing a temporary boost in price. But I doubt we gain any more than we are with the Airdrop (as right now, BBP is approximately 10x more profitable to mine than GRC on R@h and WCG). There are more than 1000 users at GRC that have competency with crypto and a RAC of less than 10K. So without staking, we could see a large number of new miners, spiking our RAC, reducing the returns for current users and having dubious conversion rates.
Free CPID: Not a bad idea, not likely to be spammed as 1 BBP is not worth much even in aggregate. The question becomes can you CPID with less than 1 BBP? If so, how much less? If so, then that should be the amount for free.
CPID in last superblock: I thought this had already been reworked to be RAC in the last week?
Investors: Right now I'm not sure what the difficulty is getting new users that are purely investors (i.e., not miners). I suppose the lack of utility is one thing. We're competing in a very crowded market, a very bear market crypto wise. The main thing we currently offer the average user is the charity aspect, but the charity is emission based, so the average investor is not actually contributing to the core mission of the coin. I'm also unclear on how the possible DAHF will benefit coin holders if one could participate in the hedge fund without holding BBP (and if you have to have BBP to participate, then that brings us closer to a security which is not ideal).
To summarize:
No staking: Against, too easy to cheat
No Team BBP: Against, lose our marketing edge, questionable conversion rate, detrimental to current users
Free CPID: For, if it can be done in a manner to prevent abuse
CPID not in Superblock: Confused, thought you could PoBH if you had a Mag in the last 7 days
Investors: A mystery. They're not jumping in now (when our price is near record lows), what do they want other than ROI?