Messages

3331

Archived Proposals / Re: BiblePay & CameroonONE

« on: February 27, 2018, 02:00:12 PM »

Just to clarify, Jaap is going to receive the 1mil for this one and convert to BTC for Cameroon, or is someone else handling?
IE who converts this to $ for Cameroon, is Cameroon in $?

Also, is there a summary of what we will receive for 1 million bbp?  (IE child count, child area, ongoing monthly fees)?

3332

Archived Proposals / Re: Language Translations - Bitcointalk Original Post

« on: February 27, 2018, 01:52:13 PM »

We need to reach the globe with our message, and since our message is only in English we cannot reach everyone.

I am requesting funding for translators to translate our Announcement Post in Bitcointalk

I have researched which languages have subforums in Bitcointalk
and have created a post on Reddit recruiting translators and have posted about it in Discord and on Bitcointalk.

All 22 Translations have been completed (waiting to receive German):
Reddit Post: https://www.reddit.com/r/BiblePay/comments/7qmt6m/bitcointalk_main_post_language_translations/

Ive so far spent a few hours doing the initial research, advertising,
communicating with interested parties, checking work, making posts and paying for the work.
The rate is average $25 per translation

The translations are currently on Bitcointalk (Vietnamese is on BitcoinGarden), I will post all translations on all the other crypto boards that support other languages, (I did get banned from Bitcoin.com forum for doing this though, I got labeled a spammer, I appealed and they never responded back, so its probably best that I do this slowly)

I am requesting $550 for translation payments ($25 per translation for 22 translations)
and 8 hours work at $20/hr ($160)

$550 + $160 = $710 at $0.003061 per BBP = 231,950 BBP

Wow, what a great idea!

We can reach the globe with ideas like this!

Ill vote yes for this.

3333

TestNet Discussion Archive / Re: BIBLEPAY -TESTNET TESTING THREAD-Proof-Of-Distributed-Computing(Cancer Research)

« on: February 27, 2018, 01:32:40 PM »

Ok, but how do you join your rosetta acc to wallet in Coinomi (if it will be)? Is it enough to change your "web page" in rosettas acc? I see that there is my controller wallet written.
And I really hope, that no one will exploit it. It would be big disadvantage for "normal" users.

So far I dont know of a way - because BOINC stamps the processor type in the distributed network AFTER the machine asks for a certain architecture of work, so we will see if it holds up.  Its going to be pretty apparent because IM going to write reports showing magnitude by CPID, so we will know if any unbanked CPID ever gets past say a 100 magnitude etc.

Anyway, that is most certainly a good question on coinomi.  Right now you would have to be able to type 'éxec associate' in order to associate that thing at home on your laptop!  So I dont have an answer for you.  But what we can do is, if we move into the integration phase with coinomi, I can ask them if we can have a custom feature added!  Maybe we have to pay a couple grand for it.

I have another idea though.  I can make the pool offer free associations for boinc users.  So if coinomi cant do it, we can do it from the pool.  The pool can pass the info into the rpc command and broadcast it and destroy the credentials, so that works!  Problem solved either way...

The GUI of the pool can just display the result of the burn, and the pool can pay the 1bbp fee.

Actually I think to accomodate the unbanked, Ill work on that before March 15th.

3334

TestNet Discussion Archive / Re: BIBLEPAY -TESTNET TESTING THREAD-Proof-Of-Distributed-Computing(Cancer Research)

« on: February 27, 2018, 01:08:47 PM »

But other reason to be "unbanked" (even if you have 50k) is that you don't have  24/7 server for controller wallet

Thats the main benefit of course.  You dont have to have a BBP balance, and you dont have to run the controller wallet.

Meaning a tiny ARM cell phone in Ethiopia could potentially buy a loaf of bread!  Once we have coinomi!

However I warn you, if anyone finds a way to exploit the unbanked feature, we will most certainly and quickly reward .75 to the unbanked side, and that will take care of the exploit in a jiffy.  For now its 1 * utxo weight * 1 * task weight * RAC = Magnitude for the unbanked.

3335

TestNet Discussion Archive / Re: BIBLEPAY -TESTNET TESTING THREAD-Proof-Of-Distributed-Computing(Cancer Research)

« on: February 27, 2018, 11:36:48 AM »

So, you must have ARM based devices on unique CPID if you want to work like unbanked?
And what if my ARM based Galaxy S7 is without "CPU type": https://boinc.bakerlab.org/rosetta/show_host_detail.php?hostid=3351184
If I have PC what I just wanna run only sometimes (and it can run with controller wallet) it must be with different CPID?

You just must not have any non-arm processors and non-blank processors on the same CPID, in order to not be disqualified.

3336

TestNet Discussion Archive / Re: BIBLEPAY -TESTNET TESTING THREAD-Proof-Of-Distributed-Computing(Cancer Research)

« on: February 27, 2018, 09:42:03 AM »

Posted by T-Mike:

Klondike, if the "bots" are doing work on Rosseta, we do not consider it a bot anymore, it is doing good work. If you are here for profit, then it makes a different, if you are not, let all the botnets in the world start computing for Rosetta.

3337

TestNet Discussion Archive / Re: BIBLEPAY -TESTNET TESTING THREAD-Proof-Of-Distributed-Computing(Cancer Research)

« on: February 27, 2018, 09:39:40 AM »

500 CPID?   1CPID=1machine=1guy

botnet script = exists in botnet forum about rosetta how can we do script for 100 users=accounts on rosetta

100 accounts= 100CPIDs=totally easy make it and owner of botnet doesnt idiot, trust me

SVK guys 20 persons
1 person do 10 accounts with 10 CPIDs=10machines

200 CPIDS for 1 day.. wink

 

and yes, you have true about botnet for rosetta= will be good deal for cancer researching

You act as if you have zero intelligence.  Its not beneficial to create more than one CPID, RAC takes 14 days to build up, magnitude is based on RAC per CPID, and it takes work to maintain each CPID. 

Slovakia, please stop posting here if you are not a NET VALUE to the community.

3338

TestNet Discussion Archive / Re: BIBLEPAY -TESTNET TESTING THREAD-Proof-Of-Distributed-Computing(Cancer Research)

« on: February 27, 2018, 09:25:10 AM »

Code: [Select]




16:06:15

masternode winners


16:06:15

{
  "10155": "yUUGJxxFFxx3e9EWU7q2G649EvEs8bNvDC:5",
  "10156": "yczua3NywynKiUUN3yzKryLJgJmgt466QV:5",
  "10157": "yczua3NywynKiUUN3yzKryLJgJmgt466QV:5",
  "10158": "yesrwrCZpBTrHXzt6o36WTAqtagvPpCp6F:1, yW7P6b7572frx11TgeyBnNCjKaRCfYz6fi:4",
  "10159": "yesrwrCZpBTrHXzt6o36WTAqtagvPpCp6F:1, yW7P6b7572frx11TgeyBnNCjKaRCfYz6fi:4",
  "10160": "yfhgGUHDYBaSyWYXd1X1gARTswyWKsyRX5:1, yjQfaAE1yqYULCJMS6FmX98jBHtaY9sdMb:4",
  "10161": "yfhgGUHDYBaSyWYXd1X1gARTswyWKsyRX5:1, yesrwrCZpBTrHXzt6o36WTAqtagvPpCp6F:3",
  "10162": "yfhgGUHDYBaSyWYXd1X1gARTswyWKsyRX5:1, yesrwrCZpBTrHXzt6o36WTAqtagvPpCp6F:3",
  "10163": "yfhgGUHDYBaSyWYXd1X1gARTswyWKsyRX5:1, yLi5aMHH4ZwXT1jPzmSKNoZHT2hyjLey7p:3",
  "10164": "yfhgGUHDYBaSyWYXd1X1gARTswyWKsyRX5:5",
  "10165": "yfhgGUHDYBaSyWYXd1X1gARTswyWKsyRX5:4",
  "10166": "ySYCxw9dKishWtwAEWN3Md8xqUSLSufZ2D:4",
  "10167": "yd7si6yg2Tp4Pkp1dSYeisWFzJwmdwsjq3:1, ySYCxw9dKishWtwAEWN3Md8xqUSLSufZ2D:3",
  "10168": "yd7si6yg2Tp4Pkp1dSYeisWFzJwmdwsjq3:1, yh4nfiwoS94uqR7yMibib6UDe7kqxXRyCe:4",
  "10169": "yd7si6yg2Tp4Pkp1dSYeisWFzJwmdwsjq3:1, yh4nfiwoS94uqR7yMibib6UDe7kqxXRyCe:4",
  "10170": "yd7si6yg2Tp4Pkp1dSYeisWFzJwmdwsjq3:1, yZ7hJEWGw3hU76xdpWaBsuAkqmvpCXbwKQ:4",
  "10171": "yd7si6yg2Tp4Pkp1dSYeisWFzJwmdwsjq3:4",
  "10172": "yd7si6yg2Tp4Pkp1dSYeisWFzJwmdwsjq3:4",
  "10173": "yUUGJxxFFxx3e9EWU7q2G649EvEs8bNvDC:1, ygfopeKeCyL6NgtP1o1T63euiBteJp8vHg:4",
  "10174": "yUUGJxxFFxx3e9EWU7q2G649EvEs8bNvDC:1, ygfopeKeCyL6NgtP1o1T63euiBteJp8vHg:3",
  "10175": "yUUGJxxFFxx3e9EWU7q2G649EvEs8bNvDC:5",
  "10176": "Unknown",
  "10177": "Unknown",
  "10178": "Unknown",
  "10179": "Unknown",
  "10180": "Unknown",
  "10181": "Unknown",
  "10182": "Unknown",
  "10183": "Unknown",
  "10184": "Unknown"
}


16:06:19

exec testranks


16:06:20

{
  "Command": "testranks",
  "percentrank 10073 0": 1,
  "percentrank 10074 0": 1,
  "percentrank 10075 0": 1,
  "percentrank 10076 100": 3,
  "percentrank 10077 300": 6,
  "percentrank 10078 300": 6,
  "percentrank 10079 100": 3,
  "percentrank 10080 300": 6,
  "percentrank 10081 100": 2,
  "percentrank 10082 0": 1,
  "percentrank 10083 300": 6,
  "percentrank 10084 200": 5,
  "percentrank 10085 100": 2,
  "percentrank 10086 400": 8,
  "percentrank 10087 300": 6,
  "percentrank 10088 100": 3,
  "percentrank 10089 0": 1,
  "percentrank 10090 0": 1,
  "percentrank 10091 0": 1,
  "percentrank 10092 200": 4,
  "percentrank 10093 0": 1,
  "percentrank 10094 200": 4,
  "percentrank 10095 200": 5,
  "percentrank 10096 200": 4,
  "percentrank 10097 300": 7,
  "percentrank 10098 0": 1,
  "percentrank 10099 400": 8,
  "percentrank 10100 0": 1,
  "percentrank 10101 200": 5,
  "percentrank 10102 200": 5,
  "percentrank 10103 0": 1,
  "percentrank 10104 300": 7,
  "percentrank 10105 100": 3,
  "percentrank 10106 200": 5,
  "percentrank 10107 200": 4,
  "percentrank 10108 200": 5,
  "percentrank 10109 100": 2,
  "percentrank 10110 200": 4,
  "percentrank 10111 0": 1,
  "percentrank 10112 200": 5,
  "percentrank 10113 400": 8,
  "percentrank 10114 300": 6,
  "percentrank 10115 200": 5,
  "percentrank 10116 200": 4,
  "percentrank 10117 100": 2,
  "percentrank 10118 0": 1,
  "percentrank 10119 100": 3,
  "percentrank 10120 0": 1,
  "percentrank 10121 200": 5,
  "percentrank 10122 0": 1,
  "percentrank 10123 300": 6,
  "percentrank 10124 400": 8,
  "percentrank 10125
  "percentrank 10176 0": -1,
  "percentrank 10177 0": -1,
  "percentrank 10178 0": -1,
  "percentrank 10179 0": -1,
  "percentrank 10180 0": -1,
  "percentrank 10181 0": -1,
  "percentrank 10182 0": -1,
  "percentrank 10183 0": -1,
  "percentrank 10184 0": -1,
  "percentrank 10185 0": -1,
  "percentrank 10186 0": -1,
  "percentrank 10187 0": -1,
  "percentrank 10188 0": -1,
  "percentrank 10189 0": -1,
  "percentrank 10190 0": -1,
  "percentrank 10191 0": -1,
  "percentrank 10192 0": -1,
  "percentrank 10193 0": -1,
  "percentrank 10194 0": -1,
  "percentrank 10195 0": -1,
  "percentrank 10196 0": -1,
  "percentrank 10197 0": -1,
  "sanctuary_count": 2
}


16:07:19

masternode count enabled


16:07:19

2


16:07:27

masternodelist


16:07:27

{
  "8a90e15bbfaeac9ed6aebb654374900346fa9ea47e91418dcb2f8083f058c00e-1": "WATCHDOG_EXPIRED",
  "0d73d75aa399c497e9569232c6dfb8f7fd0f2f3c333f10b980839dba215c1d11-1": "NEW_START_REQUIRED",
  "57347df338d9bb8fa4e91852c910047df171f318ae70dfa263a11ef5726401c2-1": "NEW_START_REQUIRED",
  "bffc8466fb89bdd425ad884e0c31a677093260a80350c2e804cfeb79b836bb0a-0": "NEW_START_REQUIRED",
  "7fb209612bed04aa95e68091cfd0958396890aa7df748ce1b68502e23b9363ec-1": "NEW_START_REQUIRED",
  "da1bc33cdb64a4ef4cf6a9194fe4ca2350b2d53ee229cbf86c61b54777442223-1": "ENABLED",
  "5d0f236522fa2a9acf8f3b8523e67a34600f754aedf146b366361ab7dea41028-1": "WATCHDOG_EXPIRED",
  "73a43e8a400802c41fd3d5b04ebfd77b809c24cb8167bf12b6ea6f1b6261eb18-1": "ENABLED",
  "70c0e1dd08b3ea91a175452cf372f047b0b3b627527679209abe906b5eb06e96-1": "WATCHDOG_EXPIRED",
  "4f2d9e9097cc065a4600fa470a5950e58699f58a9464a12ef98e695e179e94df-1": "WATCHDOG_EXPIRED",
  "c7f3413b0bcfb871babde98ddef1f375572eadf567a3b2deccdd1bd454e69d56-1": "WATCHDOG_EXPIRED",
  "44b2fcb6d8092d1e837709e2fc181ef2ecf663737e1bbdb32f6cfb9279e87273-1": "WATCHDOG_EXPIRED"
}


My masternode says that there are only 2 masternodes enabled, but the payment que suggests otherwise. I am the 'yUU' adress btw.

Thanks Jaap!  Yeah, the thing is the 'masternode list' command returns all the sancs in every state, and technically the ones in watchdog expired status that are UP, where biblepayd is responding , they are still voting for payments and end up being in the payment list and paid.  Thats because we dont have the spork enabld to Ban users for watchdog expired (watchman on the wall) violations, but we do POSE ban if the node goes down, so they are not getting free money.  SO yes we have something like 8 sancs up, the wallet thinks we have 2 (enabled sancs).

But anyway all this is OK because the Rank feature - when it exceeds the sanc count - does not fail, it just makes more sancs work than normal (IE more show 100% chance than normal), so look ing  at your report, your looks good, looks like mine...

I think that test will pass for prod.

In prod however we should have much more accuracy - about 10% voting, thats 15 sancs voting and processing files.

3339

TestNet Discussion Archive / Re: BIBLEPAY -TESTNET TESTING THREAD-Proof-Of-Distributed-Computing(Cancer Research)

« on: February 27, 2018, 09:18:04 AM »

Rob A. from where i know that problem is in BOINC?   exists any BUG TUTORIAL with BBP-ROSETTA? no, so you can test alone with 3 guys here
bye

and dont think that you kill da BOTNET..... scripts is made for ROSETTA 

BOTNET BBP yeah

Ill bet you $1000 of BBP that (after PODC Goes Live) : Either the Botnet is : A) Doing cancer research and is no longer a bot-net, or B) We are a secure happy family with lower difficulty.  Either of those is a win-win. 

My clarification is :  If difficulty is high in PODC, and we have 5,000 CPIDs for cancer research- That is No Longer a Botnet.  Why?  Because then we have our software updates on our side of the house still working, and those clear designated CPIDs are publically visible in our reports.  That makes them cancer researchers and Not a botnet.

If you are willing to take this challenge Ill send my BBP into escrow with one of the trusted members here like Togo or Jaap, and you can bet me publically.

Thats how much I believe in PODC.

3340

TestNet Discussion Archive / Re: BIBLEPAY -TESTNET TESTING THREAD-Proof-Of-Distributed-Computing(Cancer Research)

« on: February 27, 2018, 08:44:20 AM »

thx for fast answer ..woho

1. i didnt yet...ill go update now= tBBP is all
2. polpercentage setuped to 50 may be help it

thanks guys ...


Rob: whats problem when on rosetta i saw last 12hours    Error while computing  .. can be problem with less RAM? thx

These are not valid questions.

3341

TestNet Discussion Archive / Re: BIBLEPAY -TESTNET TESTING THREAD-Proof-Of-Distributed-Computing(Cancer Research)

« on: February 27, 2018, 07:22:48 AM »

As far as testing the sanctuary rank feature, this is used by the SanctuaryQuorum to determine your sanctuaries place in being called into service to process and vote on the filtered magnitude files.

Only do this if you are a synced sanctuary with a position in "masternode winners" report.  If you are not in winners, this command will be useless as we only choose sancs who have a rank.

If you have a place in the payment queue type 'exec testranks'. The tail end of this command shows the sanc count, and it looks like we have a piddly 4.  Anyway this means you should see (since we need a minimum of 2 voting sancs in testnet, 10% in prod with a minimum of 5 in prod), an alternating 50% chance of being called to filter or vote on a file, for every Other block number (since 2 minimum divided by 4 is a 50-50 chance per block).  So now look at your heights starting with the current height and go forward in the future - IE right now we are on block 10005 so go from 10005 to say 10025, and just see the pattern, is it 0%, 100%, 0%, 100%,100%, etc.  If so our rank is working. 

I am looking at my testranks report on my hot sanc and it appears this is working.  (The number is height,  percentage of being called, and Sanctuary Rank) in the report.

3342

TestNet Discussion Archive / Re: BIBLEPAY -TESTNET TESTING THREAD-Proof-Of-Distributed-Computing(Cancer Research)

« on: February 27, 2018, 07:13:09 AM »

Side note all:
Starting at block 10,000 in testnet, we now enforce the distinct CPID signatures.  Looking at 'showblock 10001, 10002, 10003' etc shows that this is working.

3343

TestNet Discussion Archive / Re: BIBLEPAY -TESTNET TESTING THREAD-Proof-Of-Distributed-Computing(Cancer Research)

« on: February 26, 2018, 08:56:17 PM »

As far as testing these things:
 -  Allow unbanked to be compensated without PODC Updates
We need to ask Rastiks to not shut down the cell phone, and not add any non-ARM rac.
Looking in my Sanctuary for Rastiks, I dont see your CPID in the list : fe553a955f0e21d46724858870014cbe.  (I found your CPID by looking at the unbanked report in the pool), anyway I see Rastiks is on the team, but your not associated in Biblepay (exec associate).  I see this by typing exec datalist dcc and do not see your CPID.  This would be a nice feature to test, so if either Rastiks could you please associate your cpid or someone else could start an unbanked CPID also?


- Fixed prayers diaplay in overview page  (they were invisible)
  Most tested - I can see exec testprayers shows the prayers and now they rotate on the overview page


- Added UTXO weight and Task Weight to Distributed Computing Page GUI
Looks good so far



- Added 7 day Magnitude and 1 day magnitude to exec getboincinfo
Now you can see both in exec getboincinfo.  This is mostly useful for debugging and seeing the magnitude trend.



- Fixed DC Association process to throw the correct distinct errors for INVALID_CREDENTIALS or ALREADY_IN_CHAIN
* Someone needs to test this



- Added cache purging system (to prevent memory bloating in the future)
* I tested this by writing special RPC commands, and its working, memory should not bloat

3344

TestNet Discussion Archive / Re: BIBLEPAY -TESTNET TESTING THREAD-Proof-Of-Distributed-Computing(Cancer Research)

« on: February 26, 2018, 08:46:54 PM »

Updated 4 nodes to 1.0.9.5b. Let us know when the windows wallets are ready. Thanks.

Ok, deployed 1095b for windows, go for it.

3345

TestNet Discussion Archive / Re: BIBLEPAY -TESTNET TESTING THREAD-Proof-Of-Distributed-Computing(Cancer Research)

« on: February 26, 2018, 05:10:48 PM »

Sorry I haven't had time to keep testing lately. V busy at work. I'll update asap. I have a couple months left over credit at some vps server providers so I will look to add these to Rosetta. I have no other use for them!

Sweet!