Messages

1861

Archived Proposals / Re: PODC TEAM REQUIREMENTS

« on: December 04, 2019, 11:44:20 AM »

Since the second place in the poll (4 votes) is allowing any team with ^1.6 stake, is that option on the table? The selfish part of me wants to limit BBP earnings to just team BiblePay, but the other side says that if you want BiblePay to survive you want to expose it to any many people as possible. That's the mechanics needed to scale a product or service... so ^1.6 stake for any team seems like the better path. The ^1.6 stake is restrictive already, so why limit teams? If you do the analysis, for grcpool with a combined RAC of 749k (240k, 243k, 310k), you would need 1.4 billion to stake BBP. The exponent already limits the RAC whales (e.g. pools like grcpool, CharityEngine, boid, etc)

I agree completely in the sense that if we want to attract unlimited new users, we should allow the possibility of any team (not just GRC), if they stake the collateral.

I'm definitely open as I want the community to get what they want out of BBP.

So, I extended the deadline 7 more days.

I feel that in order to achieve this we need more votes; so my best advice is to try to drum up more votes if you would like to see this change.

1862

TestNet Discussion Archive / Re: TestNet - PODC 2.0 (Proof of Distributed Computing)

« on: December 04, 2019, 10:43:28 AM »

Stays unconfirmed in the QT wallet. Can't abandon. I have to Wallet Repair, Recover Transactions 1 to remove it.


2019-12-04 15:22:12
VerifyDynamicWhaleStake ACCEPTED :  Amount 100000.000000, Duration 1, SatPercentAnnual 0.008545, SatPercentMonthly 0.090695, Projected DWU 1.818611, Burn DWU 1.818600GUI: Platform customization: "windows"

What is the TXID?

1863

Archived Proposals / Re: Kairos Childrens Fund Recurring charges Nov 2019

« on: December 02, 2019, 08:28:47 PM »

Test

1864

TestNet Discussion Archive / Re: TestNet - PODC 2.0 (Proof of Distributed Computing)

« on: December 02, 2019, 07:24:16 PM »

This is HEX telegram bot response to howey:
https://pastebin.com/h7k9PM4A

Theyre about to launch pretty soon, was supposed to go live already an hour ago,
I plan to put $150 of Ethereum into it today, and then sign (prove) I own Bitcoin tomorrow,
and then I plan to stake the coins for 6 years LOL

I dont mean to advertise, and I have no idea if it will go up in value,
but Im a fan of Richard Hearts youtube videos,
even though he can be a bit harsh and I disagree with him on some things,
(before this he really wanted to make a science coin and then gave up b/c it was too hard,
I think he put a good amount of time into it, it was called CFD token (CFD for Computational Fluid Dynamics))

Its fascinating how close the feature is to his description coming from absolutely unknown perspectives from each other.
Ours purely was born out of the desire to attract more new users (plus an e-mail that same night from coinbase: we are now offering a return-staking-reward on POS balances held at coinbase) and I was thinking you know we should make this based on burns (purely because that would make it hassle free).  Its also interesting how the Howey ended up relatively similar - of course that makes sense based on what expectations you are making clear the user should not expect.

Cool well good luck with the investment; I hope for an expanding market share with no slowing down.

Ill have to watch his youtube video, he looks a little familiar to me.

1865

TestNet Discussion Archive / Re: TestNet - PODC 2.0 (Proof of Distributed Computing)

« on: December 02, 2019, 07:18:17 PM »

Testnet MacOS and Linux binaries also available

So far I could associate the user and everything went smoothly

I will wait for some blocks to run exec rac and post results

Ok good, and btw, we can use help with DWS also.

1866

TestNet Discussion Archive / Re: TestNet - PODC 2.0 (Proof of Distributed Computing)

« on: December 02, 2019, 06:46:03 PM »

Thank you for explaining DWS Rob, I think its a cool feature (I like HEX coin)

I think I got confused from this example on the DWS proposal thread:
https://forum.biblepay.org/index.php?topic=468.0

15,000 should be 150,000?

Oh sorry, your exactly right - it should have been 150K.  I edited it in 2 places just now.

Is HEX very similar to this feature?  And did they also make it staking so they can be howy compliant?

1867

TestNet Discussion Archive / Re: TestNet - PODC 2.0 (Proof of Distributed Computing)

« on: December 02, 2019, 06:42:26 PM »

I do not believe I received the Kanye proposal funding,
I just created another proposal, should show up soon

===

All 3 nodes are running PrivateSend now

Im seeing this, havent seen any mixing yet:
https://i.imgur.com/FXI92Y3.png

Well on a side note I do recommend using a dedicated wallet for mixing; we definitely should not ask the user to intermingle the CPK PODC wallet with the PS inputs/outputs as I think that will just be asking for trouble.  If you could please test this in a wallet that you are not testing the 'exec rac' on that would be very helpful.

I think your PS might be working now; its showing that out of the 7 nodes, 3 are willing to mix.
That means if you let it run for a while (try the command line, privatesend start)?  see if it mixes over night.
We increased the denoms by 100* so it should consume less bills now.

1868

TestNet Discussion Archive / Re: TestNet - PODC 2.0 (Proof of Distributed Computing)

« on: December 02, 2019, 06:33:34 PM »

Im testing Dynamic Whale Staking, I just ran:

Code: [Select]

exec dws 100000 3 I_AGREE yXfpgvjvNJ5aURRQ6porVHSPJzWdiWvk9i
The DWU is 91.1005, does that mean I multiple by 1.0911005 to calculate what I will receive back?

DWS Reference: https://forum.biblepay.org/index.php?topic=468.0

So just to clarify, we use Dynamic Whale Units so as to not make any promise of a return in standard banking terms, IE this is more of a staking term.
Another thing to clarify, note that if the screen quote (from exec dws) shows DWU 95 for 30 days), your actual DWU (of 91.1005 above) is based on '3 days' and that is derived from the 30 day duration (we get less DWU for shorter burns, more DWU for longer, and even much more as you can see for locking up for 365 days). 

So to calculate the stake reward you can multiply .911005 * original burn divided by 365 (annualize it) * the duration in days, and that is the Dynamic whale reward amount (plus the original burn amount).

Also you can type 'exec dwsquote 1 1' to see your own burns, with details containing the future maturity date and total calculated amount.


Hey guys, lets test at least 10 burns each if possible, put in an easy to use suffix on the amount like '10001.10' '10002.20' or whatever you prefer and you will easily see you get back 10 in the future- i recommend doing shorter terms because we only have 15 more days of testing left.

1869

TestNet Discussion Archive / Re: TestNet - PODC 2.0 (Proof of Distributed Computing)

« on: December 02, 2019, 06:26:26 PM »

I believe I was looking at the wrong wallet,
I see that I received 1 million BBP at address: yVqyMZPPUw6JrASEgfWsRns7rDkRQFQbVF
on 11/28/19 00:20, Height: 18655

Good, thats the one I reentered.  Im fairly certain Watchman is working, because it is the same code ported over from prod.
So Im relatively sure superblocks are going to work.

Ill enter another extra proposal now.

1870

TestNet Discussion Archive / Re: TestNet - PODC 2.0 (Proof of Distributed Computing)

« on: December 02, 2019, 03:11:44 PM »

Happened again, only got to block 17444
Im updating to v1.4.8.3
Ok that worked, Im synced up now!

Btw, did you get paid for the Kanye proposal?

1871

TestNet Discussion Archive / Re: TestNet - PODC 2.0 (Proof of Distributed Computing)

« on: December 02, 2019, 02:47:12 PM »

Happened again, only got to block 17444
Im updating to v1.4.8.3
Ok that worked, Im synced up now!

Yeah, 1.4.8.2 didnt support syncing from 0, but 1.4.8.3 does.

1872

Archived Proposals / Kairos Childrens Fund Recurring charges Nov 2019

« on: November 30, 2019, 07:49:50 PM »

11B   Helena NARCISO   1 - EL   $20
14B   Princess CABUGNASAN   4 - EL   $20
12B   Tajana Veroso   5 - EL   $20
13B  Pepe Gabriel   12 - SHS   $25
16B   Earl Darren Chiu   5 - EL   $20
Rowena Paladar   11 - SHS   $25
12B   Dante Balansag   10 - HS   $23
10B   Jovelyn Cadusale   11 - SHS   $25
17B   Kate Rebutazo   10 - HS   $25
      $203


Andy is requesting 1,201,283 bbp to pay 9 of our children up (out of 21) to the end of 2019.

Our total portfolio contains these children at $20-$25 per month:

Eda Mae Omotong
Shane Marie Francisco
Wendy Domik
Rhyejiam Cielo Alqiza
Brent Aaron Cresencio
John Gabriel
Jill Jangin
Ruth Alos
Jacious Amil
Kate Rebutazo
Genevieve Umba
John Rendal
HELENA-NARCISO
DANTE-BALANSAG
PEPE-GABRIEL
PRINCESS-CABUGNASAN
ROWENA-PALADAR
KENT-SUAN
ANGEL-OZOA
JOVILYN-CABUSALE
MARKKIS-UMBA


Requesting 1.201MM from the foundation to pay Andy during the non-POOM to POOM bridge era.

1873

TestNet Discussion Archive / Re: TestNet - PODC 2.0 (Proof of Distributed Computing)

« on: November 30, 2019, 05:28:32 PM »

new version synced ok in my mac.

What can I test?

You can test the test cases in post #2.  Except, we don't need to test Cameroon-One or Kairos at this time (as Kairos is integrating now and expirimenting on their server).  We also don't need an extra sanc right now since we appear to have 7 going, but do monitor the situation if we get down to 3 again.

We primarily need to test PODC 2.0 and DWS.

I'll update when we are ready to test this branch against Prod; its not ready yet.

1874

TestNet Discussion Archive / Re: TestNet - PODC 2.0 (Proof of Distributed Computing)

« on: November 30, 2019, 05:24:41 PM »

BiblePay
1.4.8.3 - Leisure Upgrade for TestNet

- Fix bug preventing syncing from 0
- Fix 'exec rac' PODC transmission height
- Enhance 'exec sentgsc' to allow a CPK parameter to audit sent gscs by CPK
- Fix bug ensuring that unbanked cpids are included in the GSC
- Add warning when user executes sendgscc, if coin-age is low, that PODC rewards will be reduced.  Also add a warning to exec rac.

** This is the windows & self-compiled release **

1875

TestNet Discussion Archive / Re: TestNet - PODC 2.0 (Proof of Distributed Computing)

« on: November 30, 2019, 04:17:08 PM »

it's the latest version I compiled myself. I tried to delete bnstantsend.dat and rescan but still at 17444.

Ok, your right, sorry, I did not realize we introduced a bug in the latest version that prevents syncing from zero.

Please stand by for a new leisure upgrade.