Bible Pay

Show Posts

This section allows you to view all posts made by this member. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to.


Messages - MIP

Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 [7] 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 ... 25
91
So I took a look at the actual block with the shorted payments, and I believe this was caused by an older staker (there is one in the block that was pre-September 2020) and then your stakes (post September 2020).

Actually, this logic is not absolutey 100% certain (its certain that we have a mix of pre-post wallet stakes), but its not certain about the FIFO order causing the overlimit issue - actually let me put this on the debug list and see if we need a stronger rule for the Jan 2021 release... 

Ill look into this and add it to testnet.

Thanks!




4400 BBP

I checked today and saw that I didnīt receive the Dash Stake rewards last 23/12 on block 240895.

If you need any extra info to debug it just tell me.
Thanks a lot.
 

92
I feel God is male, female, transgender too.

Quote
"So God created mankind in his own image,
    in the image of God he created them;
    male and female he created them."

Trasgender category does not exist actually. It is a marxist (satanic) invention.

93
I received this listing proposal via discord

Quote
hello friend,sorry for contacting you without your immediate consent.I am Renata from FINEXBOX exchange.

https://coinmarketcap.com/exchanges/finexbox/

We have 6 pairs to choose, BTC, ETH, DOGE, LTC,USDT,TRX. Each pair is 0.2btc.

Any thought?

94
Unfortunately, it doesn’t take a prophet to see that the current economic system will fall like domino pieces sooner or later.

How it unfolds eventually and how the faithful can be protected from the disgraces remains unveiled to us.

Maybe some privileged (I hope that Rob is found worthy among them) will receive some hints through praying or direct revelation.

95
I saw the Dash stake rewards came in smoothly last friday, thatīs a great way to get some ROI for hodled BBP coins!
Thanks again to Rob for the effort taken on implementing this.
 

96
Ok I did modify a spork that might be it, please try restarting the client and try again.

Wow!! it worked! Thank you very much!

97
Oh ok, yes, I see your Dash Stake is good, (4.5) and has the correct vout.

I think the problem is you are not allowed to use sanctuary collateral as a dashstake (we block both sanctuary collateral, 4.5MM, and 1000DASH).  Imagine someone trying to use 1000 DASH LOL.

This is because in theory they can double dip if we do that.  (I think we forgot to put in a specific error message for that).

Please try a different BBP UTXO and let me know if that was the problem.  Then I will add a todo item to add an error message for that case.

Thanks!

Hi Rob, I guessed so after writing my first post about it, thatīs why I moved one collateral utxo here: a9dc5156f59cba9261dccc92d31ea597bb9b9f877070f828f695e7d5311e4ac8-1
https://chainz.cryptoid.info/bbp/tx.dws?a9dc5156f59cba9261dccc92d31ea597bb9b9f877070f828f695e7d5311e4ac8.htm

Which is 1 BBP less than the official collateral amount.
But the result message is the same

This is what I read in debug log:
Code: [Select]
ExtractAPM Height 221839=3.000000 GetDashStake::Using bbpaddr BG54CPavbTGBy54LdjaoSww6ZmMfhupwZe and dash addr  dash amount 0.000000
Deciding between bbpvalusd 286.810000 and dashvalueusd 0.000000 and qty of 0.000000 and 4500001.000000 = 0.000000 VerifyDashStake::REJECTED Dash amount too low.Consensus::ContextualCheckBlock::TestBlockValidityLite  (code 0)

98
I tried to move my BBP UTXOs to new UTXOs in case there was a problem with them, but still getting the same message as before.

99
To get past that, you just have to have more than .000001 Dash in the UTXO.  (Maybe you were using the wrong vout - like maybe the change).

Also, if one stakes $250 of BBP and $750 of Dash, the stake is based on the BBP amount, however if they stake $750 of BBP and $250 of Dash, the stake is based on the equiv amount of $250 of BBP.  So it always calculates the lower dollar value of the two to lock in the contract then each month is paid the same until it either expires or gets spent.



4200 BBP

I donīt think this is the case, both Dash UTXOs are ok:

DASH UTXO 1
cc1ce7df0095928a997ad76f7ce6b7cd5a3d4092052deb390c6d5ea3cc568bf5-0
https://chainz.cryptoid.info/dash/tx.dws?cc1ce7df0095928a997ad76f7ce6b7cd5a3d4092052deb390c6d5ea3cc568bf5.htm

Code: [Select]
08:11:53
dashstake 8e5d3da184bdad9823c5df0315486968e36727c8ee7c780c67ebe595ae35f899-1 cc1ce7df0095928a997ad76f7ce6b7cd5a3d4092052deb390c6d5ea3cc568bf5-0 [signature-here] I_AGREE

08:12:13
{
  "DWU": "48.0351",
  "Error (Not Sent)": "Dash amount too low. Unable to verify Dash Stake. "
}

DASH UTXO 2
ec38ade4cb569c2b5b13f799781b3fb44151121c70c92ffc3aa6dd56722ca955-1
https://chainz.cryptoid.info/dash/tx.dws?29561232.htm

Code: [Select]
08:14:36
dashstake c5362771138f9956c8f0fbb8ec38a2e5d5407c11733e3b9f2c37b618d3804647-1 ec38ade4cb569c2b5b13f799781b3fb44151121c70c92ffc3aa6dd56722ca955-1 [signature-here] I_AGREE

08:14:55
{
  "DWU": "48.0351",
  "Error (Not Sent)": "Dash amount too low. Unable to verify Dash Stake. "
}

So there seems to be something else that I canīt figure out.

100
I just did one for $700 (10 mil even) and it worked:

 "Monthly Earnings": 378482.1528,
  "DWU": 53.62181567996866,
  "Next Payment Height": 221670,
  "BBP Value USD": 827.46,
  "Dash Value USD": 700.87,
  "BBP Qty": 8470021.394069832,
  "BBP Amount": 10000000,
  "Dash Amount": 9.800000000000001,
  "Results": "The Dash Stake Contract was created successfully.  Thank you for using BIBLEPAY and DASH. ",
  "TXID": "bd77e2cfbb9a1ff493b23c46a898a2cda113e6ea75b832c98bfcc76e3ae10852"


Maybe try reducing your max BBP amount to 10 MM.

We can increase the limit next mandatory.  I think I put in a 10MM limit to ensure safety for the initial rollout.



4100 BBP

How do we know the right amounts for Dash and Biblepay? I am using now 1 DASH = 1M BPP which is current proportion as per SouthX price now, but it says "Dash amount too low"

Thanks

101
BiblePay Core
1.5.2.9-Mandatory Upgrade

- Disable LLMQ (send it back to testnet)
- Add POOS POSE banning (to resolve Sanctuary payment slot issue)

MIP is building MAC.

Mac and Ubuntu 16.04 build also ready.

102
BiblePay - 1.5.2.8
Mandatory Upgrade

- Standardize LLMQ rules so that all nodes homogenize

** MIP is building Mac **

We will still keeps the exchanges in maintenance a little longer, while we test chainlocks and durability over the next 410 blocks.

We can resync the chain in 410 blocks and verify syncing from zero is robust.

Mac compile ready.
Also Ubuntu 16-04-compatible compiles ready.

103
I have my sancs stalled at block 220054 (I guess that would explain why they start piling up ban score).
My controller wallet is at the same chain as your sanc.

I will run reassesschain and see what happens.

Neither reassesschain nor -erasechain=1 worked for me, they are still in an apparently stalled chain:

Code: [Select]
{
  "version": 1050207,
  "protocolversion": 70760,
  "walletversion": 61000,
  "balance": 1896.98274919,
  "privatesend_balance": 0.00000000,
  "blocks": 220056,
  "timeoffset": 0,
  "connections": 14,
  "proxy": "",
  "difficulty": 0.001729468455635417,
  "testnet": false,
  "keypoololdest": 1572338947,
  "keypoolsize": 1000,
  "paytxfee": 0.00000000,
  "relayfee": 0.01000000,
  "errors": "Warning: We do not appear to fully agree with our peers! You may need to upgrade, or other nodes may need to upgrade."

I am running 1.5.2.7b (Leisure Update), donīt know if this has anything to do with it.

104
Hi again. I think there is still some kind of forking going on. I tested your command on my sanc and it worked fine.
On my controller wallet it created an error and I checked back and saw, that this was on another chain. So I restarted it with "erasechain=1".
Now I came home from work at it is synced again, but again on a completely different chain. Also the 2 explorers seem to be different/stopped.

Could anyone please confirm, that my Sanc (at least) is on the right one?
Code: [Select]
getblockhash 220161
4f5e6f7278bf3e3e713e58c7bdf70cc0e035a37d7e0b7a22fdd9f9c53b195880

I have my sancs stalled at block 220054 (I guess that would explain why they start piling up ban score).
My controller wallet is at the same chain as your sanc.

I will run reassesschain and see what happens.

105
** SANCTUARY CHAIN APPEAL **

...
Will you all please restart your sanctuaries with "-erasechain=1".  This will erase the LLMQ folder and resync.

Once you are done with this, 'quorum list' should return empty (in contrast to returning 3 quorums (50_60 and 2 * 5_60).

Please do this immediately, because we are trying to jumpstart the quorums before block 220,000.

Thanks!

My two working sancs are showing empty, but my controller wallet shows 3 entries in quorum list. Is this ok or do I have to do anything else?

Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 [7] 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 ... 25