Bible Pay

Show Posts

This section allows you to view all posts made by this member. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to.


Messages - earlzmoade

Pages: 1 2 3 [4] 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 ... 20
46
Oh. I didn't know that was for the developers lol.

Is this Block Explorer working? It also shows nothing for my wallet since the 22nd.

https://chainz.cryptoid.info/bbp/address.dws?B7B1keQJJq8PMRFaMzJ9p9EKKEWXkkbb4a.htm

I dont see my earnings after the 22nd on that explorer either but i do see them in latest release of the core wallet.

Biblepay do not take any tithe anymore for the  dual mining monero/bbp so its pure profits for you. Aswell as you are helping out the  community.

Its been like this cense march if im not mistaken so yeah its just positive for RandomX miners.


47
Sure, here is my command line

Code: [Select]
xmrig-6.12.2/xmrig -o foundation.biblepay.org:3001 --donate-level=10 -u 4AUY2dieiuk42JiGvLR4nkfnxn4qh1KfWNoNsu7nhvHMWRJwACuVcbQ1RcqkVSHnP8aTubRte33YMXm1LKo9qVS6DFG7cBE -p B7B1keQJJq8PMRFaMzJ9p9EKKEWXkkbb4a --threads 4

Hey.
Quote
--donate-level=10
not sure if you have done it on purpose, but you are donating 10% of your hashing power to the xmrig developers, the default donation being 1% .
Other then that your batch file looks fine to me.
Im myself monero miner and i have been getting payouts every day in bbp aswell..



48
Hello Brother Rob.

Finally im back and can do some testing, no work this weekend.

Ok so what i have been tinkering with is the UTXO staking, the portfolio builder, to me it looks nice and easy to understand. Not like before were you had to manually tro to set the "correct"  bbp/eth amount  or how to say.

In this aspect i think you hit the nail spot on with the automatic value pairing.
In my test here with ethereum that i tested i went to
 Misc>Portfolio Builder  chosed Ethereum pasted my eth adress and got the pin to use in the transaction, went to ledger live wallet and just send the amount with the pin to my wallet worked just fine.
Then i just did more and more biblepay stakes to see the coverage go up to 1 .
In terminal i ran
Code: [Select]
listutxostakes 0  and i can see that it corrseponds with the details i can see in the leaderboard.


Quote
Now its time to test randomx mining against the foundation pool in prod.
You might be wondering, why are we testing mining and so many small things in this release:  Its because this is a rebase, this is not a normal release.  A rebase means we entirely replaced our codebase with a new branch. 

So what this means is BiblePay Harvest will be running in mainnet in the pool, and we will see if mining works correctly.

On a side note, I synced from 0 a while back in mainnet without a problem, and last night I ran the foundation wallet in mainnet (on harvest) without a problem; but just to be safe Im syncing from 0 on my test machine now in mainnet, and then Ill move on to testing harvest live with the randomx miners that are hitting the pool right now (just to really exploit this version in the wild).

Definitely will test the randomX hashing on pool in prod.
What parameters should we put in config file for pool mining in core wallet?

Have a great weekend everyone.

49
Hi Earlz,

Most likely then it worked;  we don't have a "successfully sent" message at the end.
To find out for sure you can click 'deliver this for real' and at least you will see the BBP coming out of your acct (should be one gone for every one sent).
Basically the code just loops through updating the address and name info, and sends a customized card to each person one by one...

On another note if you could help us create a couple non-bbp stakes in the new Portfolio builder that would really be appreciated, cause that is a brand new feature.

Thanks!

Guys, I am adding a feature now to allow generation of "gift referral codes".  This means one user who is charitable can give away their utxo reward to another user.  This should be interesting.  I have them set up so they expire in 30 days, so a charitable person basically types 'generatereferralcode Gift_Amount'  and this gift can be 'consumed' by people for 30 days.

Evenin.

Aahh yeah that would explain some things, for sure will try "deliever for real" button.

Yeah i got some eth and dash i could try the portfolio staking.


50
Evenin Rob.

I noticed new version 1.6.1.9  is out for testing.
Sweet! I will do the test cases tonight.
Downloaded and synced the new  version with no problems.
I saw my testnet sanc is pose banned, its still on 1.6.1.4 , suppose upgrade mandatory for sancs aswell?

Anyhow will get to testing the diffrent  scenarios now.

On the csv bulk i tested with 6  and 4 adresses i get so far as to all the confirmation windows , confirming the adress 1, 2 ,3 ,4 ,5 etc etc
but after that nothing happends, i just click on the last ok and nothing seems to happen.

Looking in the debug log i got this information:

Code: [Select]
ImportGreetingCards - Imported 6 LinesCalculateAPM::Result==1.000000::LastHeight 95550 Price 0.010000000000, Current Price 0.010000000000CGovernanceManager::UpdateCachesAndClean -- Governance Objects: 39 (Proposals: 3, Triggers: 36, Other: 0; Erased: 151), Votes: 172But i dont see any errors in the log.

51
Earlz, have you had to resync the chain other than mandatory upgrades? 

I believe your sanc has generally been in sync kind of wondering in totality.

Evenin.

I have not had to resync the chain, i think my sanc still on 1.6.1.4 i believe. Nor have i had to resync my normal windows wallet since update to 1.6.1.7 , it looks stable for me.

Quote
When you get a chance are you interested in testing the Batch Greeting Card send?  You just need a csv file with about 5 entries for example.  I did one over here and it worked but of course Im looking for alternative eyes etc.  I could see myself using this feature at Christmas and sending everyone I know a virtual card.

Im glad you like the icons, I think we are getting warmer with these UTXOs.  All we need is some corporate interest, and I think it can become a real service.
Imagine if a company issued retirement accounts for their employees, or really anything is possible, now that crypto is breaking out into the common world...

Im almost ready to merge in Stellar and Ripple-- will post more about that soon.

I have a question Earlz since you are a big Monero guy, you know we have access to all the monero utxo info but I realize once you send a tx it becomes a stealth address.  Do you know much about this cause this is where my knowledge falls short.  We could make a BBP UTXO for monero if we track a stealth address and an amount.  Is it plausible for the user to access the stealth address if they create a dedicated monero wallet on their end and load it with a customized value (one that ends with our pin)?

I will test the batch greeting cards this week for sure, will see if i can get some time after work the coming days.

About the monero situation im not sure, to decode specific in wallet/transactions on blockchain explorer you need the private viewkey or else just shows stealthadresses and little info.

Indeed would be intresting with monero as as a option for  BBP UTXO staking.
Possible? Sadly to say Rob im not that into the technincal details how stealthadresses and RingCT and all those things work.
 
Have a great week and i talk to you laters.

52

Hi Earlz,

Sweet, yes looks relatively solid, although I think I will go ahead and make a google sheet to track 10 of them over a little duration just so we can see the icons change too.
On the 48-49% penalty, thats good,  sounds good, I did end up capping the penalty at 50% just to give the user an incentive to terminate it for the extra cash (rather than keep it to the end)
 cause who would terminate it  (while reaping from our daily kitty) if we penalized them 80%+ etc.  So basically, we penalize them at double what we believe it costed us, but we cap it at 50% no matter when the fault occurs.

Yes your other highrisk stakes look good too.   Im not too concerned about any risk about continually paying someone for a stake they spent (because the code is solid that detects spent utxos), although Im definitely concerned about the ability to "covertly spend a high risk stake" and not pay the fee.  I thought about this extensively , and I believe we have it covered.  Basically heres what would happen:  If you spend a high risk stake from the UI, the transaction will not be created unless the (burn-network-fee) is included, and if someone were to forge or falsify a fake version of biblepay, and drop one hex version of the tx on the network, the other nodes would reject that tx in the memory pool.  Same thing would happen if they create a binary transaction from the RPC and try to spend that coin - the tx will be rejected in the mempool.  So that risk should be eliminated.

Now all I have to do is make the spreadsheet for the sake of verifying the icons and spend status.
Did you take a look at the icon state of each of your high risk stakes in coin control?  You should see a DOVE for the one(s) that are Fulfilled (and free to spend), and a chain-hard-drive looking icon for the ones that are not fulfilled yet?

I feeel pretty good about referral codes also.  From what I can see, there is no attack vector possible (if someone uses too many codes, they get capped at 10% of the portfolio size).  If many codes are attached, they are capped.  If people share codes among friends, they are capped.   Just to clarify, codes are also limited to one distinct code per direction per cpk, so there is no unfair advantage among any player, either.   Additionally, this reward is decreasing over 700 days at the decay factor  - basically my feeling is we ramp up some referral code reward activity now for the next two years and that sort of gets phased out as the portfolios age and this is our chance to popularize biblepay.  Obviously these are assessed at the sanc level so there is no risk of anyone falsifying a greater referral code than another...

So yeah I will take care of the spreadsheet next, do you have any other concerns in this version?

I also need to make that CSV wiki for us right now so we can test csv greeting cards.

Thanks.

Evenin Brother Rob.

Quote
Did you take a look at the icon state of each of your high risk stakes in coin control?  You should see a DOVE for the one(s) that are Fulfilled (and free to spend), and a chain-hard-drive looking icon for the ones that are not fulfilled yet?

Indeed, i think the icons looks just fine, easy to see diffrence between normal stake and highriskstake and ofcourse aswell the dove for the fulfilled ones easy to spot aswell. Thumbs up from me.


Quote
So yeah I will take care of the spreadsheet next, do you have any other concerns in this version?

The user experience feels smooth, the core wallet responsive and all. The new interface right up my alley..

I have one thing i was thinking of, if its possible to add the penalty bbp fee in USD aswell in the popup window  for the final confirmation, something like: "Biblepay will charge 100 000 bbp (50 USD) for this transaction"
Just thought could be sweet to have the fee in USD aswell.

Talk to you later, have a great weekend.



53
Sanctuary Discussions / Re: Raspberry pi 4 2gb/4gb
« on: May 15, 2021, 02:52:08 PM »
Quote
Anyway did you buy the phone case to make a case for the pi as a computer or is that just a separate thing?

Yeah, I look forward the day you can run a sanctuary at home on something like a pi with less than 10 watts, maybe on solar power or something.

The phone is just a plain old phone  8)

Yeah i have also been thinking about solar and things, its some intresting ideas for sure.
Would be awesome to see like 1000+ masternodes for biblepay, supporting the network and also sponsoring a child.
Some sort of tiered masternodes i think also could be intresting.
Still i think the 1 masternode 1 orphan is a great thing. 

54
Gdday.

Quote
Hi Earlz,

So although I don't think anything has been discovered that is 'broken' yet I see that we need very in-depth testing for these scenarios to make sure all these high risk staking features are solid (spending them, checking the penalty, the icons etc).

So first of all on the one you were creating from the UI, with the error "must be between 10K-10MM".  Know that in the UI, we simply check to see if you have an *extra* small coin (between 1-1K) available for the utxo-fee (in addition to the stake coin).  Its a little bit of a nuisance, but its possible either the coin control had some coins selected; or you didnt actually have the extra coin...   Could you try again after knowing that no coins are selected in coin control (try a UI checkbox stake) while there is at least one small coin in the wallet?  You can make a small coin with 'banroll 5 1' for example.

On the transaction create failed while spending a high risk stake, I definitely need to know what the coins icon looked like (was it a dove, or was it a chain?).  If it was a dove, I think what probably happened is you selected to spend it, typed in the whole amount and clicked SEND.  This means there was no extra available for change and for the tx fee.  You can safely type in LESS than the amount, and it will just give you change.  I think the problem was simply the tx fee needed more size.

I think we should test about 10 new scenarios, if we can guys.  Can we create some high risk stakes and put them in a little spreadsheet, of varying durations (IE 30 days to 100 days) and test different spending scenarios on those?  As mentioned earlier we will see testnet time go by 24* faster than normal, so the 30 day high risk stake will be mature in only 1.5 days.  Also we can deliberately try to spend a few and see what the hit is.  When you guys do this please look at the coin control icon also, note which stage it is in and verify the stage matches what it should be (IE immature is a chain and its locked etc).

Let me know did I miss anything you guys are testing with high risk?  Or in other areas?

Alright now i Think things are moving forward.

I managed to spend  the  tbbp only highriskstake that i made earlier.

Code: [Select]
17:54:03
highriskbbpstake 777777 365 1


17:54:08
{
  "BBP UTXO": "926c119765f820695028c32ed8a2a8f9ef783c4ffa6a9b5de6a5198e30968edf-11",
  "BBP Address": "yhFqES1X7kY4nSxnLgieZTE3ytCBL3yWrx",
  "BBP Amount": 777777.001,
  "Commitment Days": 365,
  "DWU": 307.064728349887,
  "!WARNING!": "When you promise to lock for 365 days for a high yield reward,  you hereby AGREE that you may be PENALIZED by up to 50% of the value of your UTXO.   If you do not fulfill your obligation, your original UTXO will have burn fees deducted from it.   EXAMPLE:  You have a 100,000 BBP coin.  You lock it for 90 days for a 40% DWU.  On the 15th day you try to spend the coin (breaking your obligation).   You will be penalized 40%*2=80% (capped at 50% max) of your original UTXO.   (If you do not agree please use our conservative staking feature: easybbpstake.)  Thank you for using BIBLEPAY.  ",
  "BBP Value USD": 782.5136147227827,
  "UTXO Value": 1565.027227433385,
  "Results": "The UTXO Stake Contract was created successfully.  Thank you for using BIBLEPAY. ",
  "TXID": "87d4fae09f9cefae4130f78717f65f8a75da6341b12fb77880fec08f54cba173"
}

Like you said :
Quote
On the transaction create failed while spending a high risk stake, I definitely need to know what the coins icon looked like (was it a dove, or was it a chain?).  If it was a dove, I think what probably happened is you selected to spend it, typed in the whole amount and clicked SEND.  This means there was no extra available for change and for the tx fee.  You can safely type in LESS than the amount, and it will just give you change.  I think the problem was simply the tx fee needed more size.

It was the chain one, so i believe i was trying to spend the entire amount like you said and it didnt work for me, although i was sure i tested to just withdraw a bit of it aswell to test and it didnt work, im thinking i didnt calculate in the penalty in the transaction and therefore the transaction didnt work.

Now i set spend to just 10k and the transaction worked , high risk spend.

Code: [Select]
Status: 11 confirmations, locked via ChainLocks
Date: 2021-05-15 10:50
To: yLKSrCjLQFsfVgX8RjdctZ797d54atPjnV
Debit: -388 888.50050000 tBBP
Transaction fee: -0.06575000 tBBP
Net amount: -388 888.56625000 tBBP
Transaction ID: 76b968a7fa7da860b0c805822fc0843fd9f1504e39b212078573881aee4d54ea
Output index: 2
Transaction total size: 263 bytes

Height: 89350
Difficulty: 0.00
Time: 05-15-2021 08:53:22
Subsidy: 7420.6421

Debit: -777 777.00100000 tBBP
Credit: 10 000.00000000 tBBP
To: yWxLzk2tEFSuaw1s2V3rYLrPb6itNi8w7U 10000.0000 BIBLEPAY
Credit: 378 888.43475000 tBBP
To: yVdHJQWeGp1ikiPbmdnqGGTXZFWgudkBQe 378888.0000 BIBLEPAY

looks like i received : 48.71422014279157%  penalty for shorting the highrisk stake.

Then i created Another highriskstake but for 31 days and spent it.

Code: [Select]
10:48:04
highriskbbpstake 2999999 31 1


10:48:05
{
  "BBP UTXO": "2e6ef29f17796ef05e542a061c4c1d31f5ff8f795662a83d637c86f18cd6eee7-0",
  "BBP Address": "yWxLzk2tEFSuaw1s2V3rYLrPb6itNi8w7U",
  "BBP Amount": 2999999.95275,
  "Commitment Days": 31,
  "DWU": 183.8171421328033,
  "!WARNING!": "When you promise to lock for 31 days for a high yield reward,  you hereby AGREE that you may be PENALIZED by up to 50% of the value of your UTXO.   If you do not fulfill your obligation, your original UTXO will have burn fees deducted from it.   EXAMPLE:  You have a 100,000 BBP coin.  You lock it for 90 days for a 40% DWU.  On the 15th day you try to spend the coin (breaking your obligation).   You will be penalized 40%*2=80% (capped at 50% max) of your original UTXO.   (If you do not agree please use our conservative staking feature: easybbpstake.)  Thank you for using BIBLEPAY.  ",
  "BBP Value USD": 1468.41205292861,
  "UTXO Value": 1604.294957848415,
  "Results": "The UTXO Stake Contract was created successfully.  Thank you for using BIBLEPAY. ",
  "TXID": "c44e2f543128125ad5cd2bd5e22ca3e83cd1c245646332109233598160a2985d"

This time it worked aswell.

Code: [Select]
Status: 38 confirmations, locked via ChainLocks
Date: 2021-05-15 14:13
To: yLKSrCjLQFsfVgX8RjdctZ797d54atPjnV
Debit: -1 499 999.97637499 tBBP
Transaction fee: -0.06575000 tBBP
Net amount: -1 500 000.04212499 tBBP
Transaction ID: b54141b62ea5d14484903a238320dfcfcf57cf1eba2b8d1708f5b648ab678a29
Output index: 2
Transaction total size: 262 bytes

Height: 89398
Difficulty: 0.00
Time: 05-15-2021 12:20:42
Subsidy: 7420.6421

Debit: -2 999 999.95275000 tBBP
Credit: 100 000.00000000 tBBP
To: ybnpUQZLECgeM9gS6K8QnjU7tpfZDnJGhv 100000.0000 BIBLEPAY
Credit: 1 399 999.91062501 tBBP
To: yPQaCMUyAGBSnYnhQnTAe5r7jvRvv8AbZ6 1399999.0000 BIBLEPAY

Close to 50%  penalty this time aswell.
Took a screenshot of the final spend, looks solid from here.

Running  command
Code: [Select]
listutxostakes 0 0Showed all my stakes as spent, so good there aswell.

Code: [Select]
17:02:33
listutxostakes 0 0


17:02:33
{
  "87d4fae09f9cefae4130f78717f65f8a75da6341b12fb77880fec08f54cba173": {
    "RiskType": "H",
    "DWU": 330.1866559622127,
    "Sigs": "1-NA",
    "TotalValue": 730.679081890743,
    "Ticker": "BBP",
    "Status": 1,
    "CPK": "yhFqES1X7kY4nSxnLgieZTE3ytCBL3yWrx",
    "BBPAmount": "777777.00000000",
    "ForeignAmount": "0.00000000",
    "BBPValue": "365.34",
    "ForeignValue": "0.00",
    "Commitment": 365,
    "Fulfilled %": 32.59172126426262,
    "Time": 1620662685,
    "Spent": true
  },
  "c44e2f543128125ad5cd2bd5e22ca3e83cd1c245646332109233598160a2985d": {
    "RiskType": "H",
    "DWU": 180.3706241735368,
    "Sigs": "1-NA",
    "TotalValue": 1539.568824622444,
    "Ticker": "BBP",
    "Status": 1,
    "CPK": "yhFqES1X7kY4nSxnLgieZTE3ytCBL3yWrx",
    "BBPAmount": "2999999.95000000",
    "ForeignAmount": "0.00000000",
    "BBPValue": "1409.17",
    "ForeignValue": "0.00",
    "Commitment": 31,
    "Fulfilled %": 20.08670805531364,
    "Time": 1621068528,
    "Spent": true
  },
  "Total BBP": "3777776.95000000",
  "Total Foreign": "0.00000000",
  "Total Hybrid BBP": "3777776.95000000",
  "High Risk Pctg": 0.0215030641866466,
  "DWU": 252.9650150395335
}
EDIT: These tests i did on the v1.6.1.4-Harvest


55
Sanctuary Discussions / Re: Raspberry pi 4 2gb/4gb
« on: May 15, 2021, 08:25:37 AM »
Did it work man?

I never did create a sanc on the pi, it became a monero full node.

I have some future plans of getting one of those  Argon ONE m.2 case simply so i can put in m2 ssd instead of unstable sd card.

If i manage to tinker abit with it im thinking try and get testnet sanc up on it.
Its some pretty awesome little computers these raspberry pi .

Im also looking at the Rock Pi X with emmc module , having x86 and all.

56
Figure i do the referral code test scenario.

Quote
- Attach a portfolio code to your portfolio.  This lets you earn up to 10% more per year if you are able to find 10* the amount of portfolio code "size" than your own portfolio.  For example if you have a 1MM portfolio, and you attach 10MM of codes, you should earn 10% (in a diminishing rate at the decay factor per day).
I will attach a code for you guys now from my testnet portfolio which has 130MM bbp in it:
2a21d83da8a12a078790e763c383dadbb42785916ae5356cdba1f648c73340b4

To attach it do this:
attachreferralcode code

Then after a couple blocks type:
listattachedreferralcodes

And look in the leaderboard, double click on your name and verify the code has a "Referral Rewards" modifier.  This is the factor that your DWU is modified by (in boost).  For example if you have a 50% DWU, and a 1.10 modifier, you will end up with .50*1.1 = .55%  DWU for example.
Note that you also receive a two-way reward when Others attach *your* code.  So please also do a 'generatereferralcode' and paste one of yours here and I will attach yours to my portfolio.


Note that in order to do these tests, you should have a nickname set up in "Edit user record" - be sure your nickname is populated and the record is saved in the chain.

It looks like it went just fine, i attached your referral code Rob.

Code: [Select]
16:29:17
attachreferralcode 2a21d83da8a12a078790e763c383dadbb42785916ae5356cdba1f648c73340b4


16:29:18
{
  "Attached": "7ee3c10d4323303036693a715ff2cdf20346b12b989ac10c1adc149379e17a2a"
}


17:05:24
listattachedreferralcodes


17:05:24
{
  "Details": {
    "2A21D83DA8A12A078790E763C383DADBB42785916AE5356CDBA1F648C73340B4-Claimed-Originator yLbyhFoEurwToxcTrthXoX6Ln7ieMY3sM5-Consumer YHFQES1X7KY4NSXNLGIEZTE3YTCBL3YWRX": 148993648.75,
    "Referral BBP Claimed": 148993648.75,
    "Referral BBP Earned": 0,
    "Total BBP in Portfolio affected": 777777,
    "Portfolio % affected by rewards": 100,
    "Referral Code Effectivity %": 9.847999999999999,
    "Total Portfolio DWU Impact %": 109.848
  },
  "Portfolio Rewards Modifier": 1.09848
}

Here is my referral code:
Code: [Select]
27bc5c80b4cbf728fec8a53a5a0745b39abb0465a83c90a23a288513e89b9789

57
Hello Pat.

Quote
Keep getting this error....Illegal instruction (core dumped)

[email protected]:~/BiblePay/Testnet$ ./biblepay-qt conf=biblepaytest.conf
Illegal instruction (core dumped)

[email protected]:~/BiblePay/Testnet$ dir
biblepay-cli  biblepayd  biblepay-qt  biblepaytest.conf

[email protected]:~/BiblePay/Testnet$ ./biblepay-qt
Illegal instruction (core dumped)

I havent encountered that error code Before, hmmm.
I wonder if it could have something to do with its older cpu thats not support AES or avx etc etc.
Hmm well its just speculation on my end.

Did you compile the wallet yourself or did you just download the binary  and unzip (the easy way) ?
 
I think Rob could do some better troubleshooting with you.
Anyways best of luck to you.



58
Hi Earlz,

Looks like you are a competent IT guy, could you help me out (if you are familiar with Linux), I would really appreciate some help in getting Testnet up and running on a new Ubuntu Desktop…..

Thanks, Pat

Ubuntu 20.04.2 LTS
64-bit

Created directory: home/pat/BiblePay/bbp-lin-develop-64
files in this Folder:
biblepay-cli
biblepayd
biblepay-qt
biblepaytest.conf

From tips from a search, I have run these commands from the command line….
$ sudo apt-get update
$ sudo apt-get install build-essential
$ sudo apt-get install qtcreator
$ sudo apt install qt5-default
$ sudo apt-get install qt5-doc qtbase5-examples qtbase5-doc-html

Evenin Pat.



Looks like you are almost home, just have to set up the biblepay config file.

So i usually just run command 
Code: [Select]
cd ~/biblepay to get into the biblepay folder in the terminal.
then you can run the
Code: [Select]
ls command in terminal to list folders and files inside the biblepay folder.

This being said you should have gotten another file folder when you unzipped the biblepay zip file.
Called
Code: [Select]
.biblepaytest location i think your home folder.
If you dont see the file you will have to click the "show hidden files" button , its right next to the minimize button on the top right.

So Pat you could try this out:
Open up terminal window then :

1
Code: [Select]
cd ~/biblepay2
Code: [Select]
mv biblepaytest.conf /home/pat/.biblepaytest3
Code: [Select]
cd ~/.biblepaytest4
Code: [Select]
nano biblepaytest.confNow you should have gotten nano text editor open and can configurate testnet so to say.  in there just add parameter:
Code: [Select]
testnet=1
debug=1
then you can just hit Ctrl+x  and save the above Changes that you made to the biblepaytest.conf  file.

then just
Code: [Select]
cd ~/biblepaythen
Code: [Select]
./biblepay-qt -conf=biblepaytest.conf
Then i belive it should work for you Pat.
Im no expert either at linux but we learn as we go.
If you wonder anything else or something you  thinking of just give out a shout.

59
Evenin Rob.

Trying to spend the high risk bbp stake i get 2 errors.
First pop up window saying "insufficient funds" and the next one that pops up is "transaction creation failed"

What i tried was target the high risk stake in the coin control have it schecked in then try and send the entire stake to my main test wallet,  i have tested to check/uncheck the box called "subtract fee from amount"  , well it dosent seem to make any diffrence , just that i get another pop up window.
Right now i created a normal tBBP stake to see if i can liquidate that one.
I noticed that from the ui it didnt work for me to make the stake just said "Unable to create UTXO stake , unable to find stake between 10k&10MM older then 24hours" 
So then i tested from the terminal/console

Code: [Select]
19:17:54
easybbpstake 2999999 1


19:17:54
{
  "BBP UTXO": "e429a3d8f8a1204d0816a01cb7364e3fec534c0fce67d43cda7fb3cb68519521-13",
  "BBP Address": "yhFqES1X7kY4nSxnLgieZTE3ytCBL3yWrx",
  "BBP Amount": 3000000.001,
  "Commitment Days": 0,
  "DWU": 168.3734873672299,
  "BBP Value USD": 2334.035517832162,
  "UTXO Value": 2334.03551705415,
  "Results": "The UTXO Stake Contract was created successfully.  Thank you for using BIBLEPAY. ",
  "TXID": "70de2242b1c213d8604cbab69dd6da8a067f9278caf43372d43c4f13e6325c79"
}


Now it worked normal.


So the trouble i have Rob is to simply spend the locked high risk bbp stake so to say.
I believe earlier that i spend a highriskstake but that one was already fulfilled so no penalty there.
Any ideas on ways to spend non fulfilled stake?
Creating the high risk stakes both pure bbp and bbp+foreign currency i have had no problems with.

Anyways while im continuing trying and tinkering im gonna read up on what more test cases you got going.

Talk to you laters.

60
Hello Rob.

Quote
So Earlz will you be able to test the remaining test cases also, like for example the icons and the spend status of the high risk stakes and the referral codes etc?

Yeah ofcourse i wil do the test scenarios  you posted, will try do some tonight, the highrisk stakes and what not.
So yeah stay tuned.

10-4 on the "exec revive sanc", will do aswell.

Pages: 1 2 3 [4] 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 ... 20