Bible Pay

Show Posts

This section allows you to view all posts made by this member. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to.


Messages - earlzmoade

Pages: 1 ... 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 [20] 21
286
TestNet Discussion Archive / Re: BIBLEPAY - RANDOMX INTEGRATION
« on: February 23, 2020, 02:15:01 PM »
I think its a cool feature

and RandomX seems to be pretty popular in the Altcoin Mining section of Bitcointalk

I started a Bitcointalk thread about Merge Mining BBP and XMR:
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5226080.0
(Please post in here periodically!)

How do we spread the news of our feature to all the Monero miners?

Monero is really big and so far as i know Bbp is the only coin that has this feature, being able to dual mine with xmr..
Although in testnet, but for sure it seems like a superb idea, when i saw it posted in reddit i was like finally, this is groundbreaking..

Aswell as that Bbp is not just another blockchain with the same features, what i feel is puts Bbp in another bracket is the charity aspect of it.

Christians or not christians people will jump aboard, we could do a post on lets say reddit/moneromining   and so forth to get some more people when we are getting closer to launch.

Aswell as you did the mining altcoins section i saw.  Intresting times ahead indeed.

287
TestNet Discussion Archive / Re: BIBLEPAY - RANDOMX INTEGRATION
« on: February 23, 2020, 04:15:24 AM »
In the NOMP rx test getting started section, under example  you could add lets say.


to add .your_worker_name after monero adress for per cpu information.

Perhaps its self explanable but its never wrong to make things easy for people that are new to this  kind of stuff.

288
TestNet Discussion Archive / Re: BIBLEPAY - RANDOMX INTEGRATION
« on: February 21, 2020, 01:57:07 PM »
Btw Rob i noticed diff seems ok on output in xmrig now, just wondering all Xmr charity chares always show 0 ms for me.

Shouldnt it be mixed like normal xmr shares like some show 60 ms, others 77 ms and so on..

Anyways great job on latest release!

289
TestNet Discussion Archive / Re: BIBLEPAY - RANDOMX INTEGRATION
« on: February 21, 2020, 12:45:18 PM »
Thank you.

1. Firstly as you realized that I have not been able to recreate my sancs as somehow none of wallets were able to sync past 28010 and those that did at the correct hash as you published were empty.

2. Hence I would appreciate it if you could kindly send sufficent tBBP to be able to recreate the number of sancs that you would require me to setup in testnet. Address: yfAMxhGyQUXSAaPeV7d7YfhmQnY9o6utwA. Thank you.

3, I have been dual mining XMR + BBP at the moment (without synced BBP wallets). This innovative strategy is great, I really like the pace of innovation at BBP, though it can be challenging to keep up at times! I like the idea but have no idea how it will affect the long term economics. One needs to calculate the optimal ABN such that it manages to sustain the price of BBP assuming a large percentage of new XMR+BBP miners liquidate their BBP.

Thank you.

i  have no sanctuaries yet.  I have alot of these  tbbp i send over for you.

290
TestNet Discussion Archive / Re: BIBLEPAY - RANDOMX INTEGRATION
« on: February 21, 2020, 10:34:07 AM »
From my perspective i was really hyped for the monero changing alghorithm from cryptonight to randomx because i already  had a bunch of cpus, and i think monero has a bright future so i want to support them.

Same time i really liked the idea of Bbp, giving to charity and all.
So then it was like shall i mine xmr or bbp cant do both on my cpus.. well dilemmas were rising.
 
Now  i think you might have hit the  jackpot, i mean xmr preety stable in price and all.  Also hopefully alot more help for those in need.  I belive alot of people are intrested in dual mining aswell. In the end i support monero network , bpp aswell and also can help some people in need. Cant ask for much more.


291
TestNet Discussion Archive / Re: BIBLEPAY - RANDOMX INTEGRATION
« on: February 21, 2020, 08:44:57 AM »
XMRIG - 5.6.1-Leisure Upgrade for TestNet



- Pass actual share difficulty through to miner as first solved
parameter, and Solved share difficulty as second param (in brackets) for
each solved share, and add network latency to each solved share
- Modify code to be more compatible with future xmrig changes

ill be trying out 5.6.1 out later tonight on both windows and linux over the weekend.
Been running 5.6.0 on linux for 18h and it seems real stable for me,  not many rejects at all. accepted 1776/22 this with  Bbp 10 difficulty.

292
TestNet Discussion Archive / Re: BIBLEPAY - RANDOMX INTEGRATION
« on: February 19, 2020, 02:25:33 PM »
Sounds nice!  8)

Yeah i was wondering before why only saw 1 difficulty  when changing bbp difficulty..


293
TestNet Discussion Archive / Re: BIBLEPAY - RANDOMX INTEGRATION
« on: February 19, 2020, 12:14:05 PM »
Looks like this latest release was real solid! I ran one rig for over 12 hours and only a few bbp share rejects, also

Currently installed ubuntu etc on another rig and fiddling with activating 1 gb huge pages.
Then im gonna see how it works.

294
TestNet Discussion Archive / Re: BIBLEPAY - RANDOMX INTEGRATION
« on: February 18, 2020, 04:35:41 PM »
5.5.9 i got up and running.
Im testing out the  3256 port.

after 5 minutes i got 2 biblepay shares so seems working better now with lower difficulty.

Positive the terminal got less cluttered. 

ill let it run 12 hours atleast.

295
TestNet Discussion Archive / Re: BIBLEPAY - RANDOMX INTEGRATION
« on: February 18, 2020, 11:52:17 AM »
Hey Rob.

Im testing new miner now.
Quick question, i changed the : rxtest.biblepay.org:3008 to rxtest.biblepay.org:3256

to change difficulty. Monero and charity monero seems fine from output but i havent seens any bbp solved or rejected.

Should i switch back to starting difficulty ?
Also can say that i have been running miner for 30 minutes so i figured should have gotten some bbp shares solved atleast.

296
TestNet Discussion Archive / Re: BIBLEPAY - RANDOMX INTEGRATION
« on: February 18, 2020, 11:12:19 AM »
XMRig - 5.5.8 - Leisure Upgrade
GCC Version



This release is the GCC version for both windows and linux.
May we please test this new version on both platforms to ensure long term stability?

Sure thing. I will try Windows version today and tomorrow evening hopefully i will have a new rig for linux to test on aswell.

297
TestNet Discussion Archive / Re: BIBLEPAY - RANDOMX INTEGRATION
« on: February 18, 2020, 09:17:36 AM »
So I'm going through the code today in an attempt to merge the latest randomx changes into xmrig, and also to harden the build to prevent crashes.
This algorithm is huge, it's a monster when considering how much machine language is generated.
I've exploited some conditions where the bytecode that is generated crashes about 10 stack frames ahead of the last hash (another words the actual crash occurs in the rx virtual machine, in machine language).  Ive been trying to isolate this as it appears to actually be in the jit code on the rx side (last night I removed all the possible biblepay code around it and it still points to the jit code, so Im merging in the latest from XMRig now to see if its something they fixed recently).

But anyway, Id like to find out each OS version that is running out there.  Im using windows 7.  Can each of you please post if you are primarily using the windows exe or the linux version?

After the next build we will need a volunteer to run the linux version for a few days straight, to ensure the jit issue is fixed.  The windows version will probably be OK, as we have a compiler flag we can  set that will overcome any machine language exceptions and let it recover (and keep mining).

Im using windows 10 on my machines.
Gonna move over my headless systems to ubuntu.  Also im no linux guru so  yeah.....

Also i have been running almost 24 hours now i belive this latest miner and it seems to me it works pretty nice.

I have  3.99%  rejected shares for bbp.
Perhaps i can get less rejected shares by changing difficulty to 256 for bbp ?


298
TestNet Discussion Archive / Re: BIBLEPAY - RANDOMX INTEGRATION
« on: February 17, 2020, 10:53:09 AM »
Thats interesting that the 11% increase pulls 27% more watts (probably 14 more watts or so).
But it also makes me wonder about total system power consumption to break even with XMR.  I remember seeing something like 10,000 hps required to breakeven at 8 cents a kwh, but I believe I was using 500 watts for the power supply.

So out of curiosity do you know if any of these industrial miners can pack 10 ryzen procs in a single machine using some type of board, so the total system power supply is only 1500 watts?  Similar to how they chain asics together?

Im seeing that the casual gamer will pretty much receive their stipend back in the form of xmr while the household pays the electricity (plus they get bbp of course in our case which is a pro).

Im almost ready to release the new miner.



For sure its intresting idea daisy chain cpus.  Atleast i dont think there is that for ryzen processors, closest would be to get some dual socket epyc processors i belive.
Myself i just get asus boards so i can setup OS  and miner remote access and all then remove gpu and just run the machine headless.  Saves a few watts not having to think of the gpu.


something like the intel xeon phi but for ryzen would be sweet.

However we think about it its intresting years ahead with 3d stacking cpus, ddr5 coming to zen 4 i belive it was, intels forevos and so on.

299
TestNet Discussion Archive / Re: BIBLEPAY - RANDOMX INTEGRATION
« on: February 17, 2020, 09:36:02 AM »
Did Another comparison with 8 threads and higher Clocks.

  • Ryzen 5 1600 (14nm)@3.8ghz, 1.15v vcore, Asus b350 rog strix,  8 threads, --cpu-affinity 0xD75, 1x8gb 3200mhz cl16
  • BBP+Xmr-8740 HPS, 70 watts
  • Ryzen 5 1600 (14nm)@3.8ghz, 1.15v vcore, Asus b350 rog strix,  8 threads, --cpu-affinity 0xD75, 1x8gb 3200mhz cl16
  • Xmr only - 4375HPS, 70 watts

Conclusion 10.6% increase in hashrate but 27% increase in Power over the 6 thread config.

300
TestNet Discussion Archive / Re: BIBLEPAY - RANDOMX INTEGRATION
« on: February 17, 2020, 09:31:32 AM »
Did Another comparison with 8 threads and higher Clocks.

  • Ryzen 5 1600 (14nm)@3.3ghz, Asus b350 rog strix,  8 threads, --cpu-affinity 0xD75, 1x8gb 3200mhz cl16
  • BBP+Xmr-8740 HPS, 70 watts
  • Ryzen 5 1600 (14nm)@3.3ghz, Asus b350 rog strix,  8 threads, --cpu-affinity 0xD75, 1x8gb 3200mhz cl16
  • Xmr only - 4375HPS, 70 watts

Conclusion 10.6% increase in hashrate but 27% increase in power

Pages: 1 ... 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 [20] 21