Not to belabor the argument T-Mike but consider this.
A Mag of 160, means 16% of the daily reward will go to that user. If the daily reward were just 1M / day (which is very sustainable for quite a while), then that is 160K coins per day. At the 20K/Mag level, a 160 Mag user needs 3.2M Coins. The other option is they could buy 2 MN with that, and get about...10K coins per day. Requiring some sort of stake keeps people from jumping into and out of the coin as quickly. That brings a stable user base. That is good.
One minor modification I think would benefit all and solve the unbanked issue is since you need 1BBP to establish yourself on the wallet, what if we said that 1 BBP was enough for 1% UTXOWeight. That would mean anyone with 1 BBP could get 1%, over time they could garner enough to get 100%. The above 160 Mag RAC would end up with (if they got 100% for uptime) 1600 BBP the first day, and over a moderate time would be able to get 100% for Mag.
I don't think your argument of a 5% total stake of this coin will bring about stability. I would say you would need at least 50% of the total coin supply. If you can't reach that level, then all we are doing is purposely giving more advantage to average users. Which to say is not a bad thing, but I think people with high computing power will disagree.
We should at least do a log curve for the staking if this really passes. Also, I hope if only 20 people vote on the poll we don't write this into stone, there should be a minimum number of votes. Not a lot of people are actually active on this forum.