Show Posts
3226
Archived Proposals / Re: Biblepay Charity Commission - Revised
« on: March 31, 2018, 07:24:08 AM »Yes, just approval for the idea. The commission is supposed to handle the ins and outs of everything related to charity. I thought we could start small and first create an address for donations. Now sure, there is the foundation address also so maybe we can use that but it's tied to the Compassion fund and it's only handled by one person. There is currently no plan to spend it on another charity and it is not for me to decide anyways. Whatever goes into the fund will first support the current charities and if a large enough of a buffer is created we can consider using it for other charities.
If the fund is approved, there will be 2 people who keep each other accountable. And yes it will take load off of you because you wouldn't have to deal with storing the coins, selling coins, and transferring it to Compassion. Everything that is BBP will be accountable on the blockchain, and everything that is converted to cash will be posted on the website for transparency. All of these things take precious time off from our only dev.
Sure, it makes everything easier when there is only 1 person that handles everything but you also become the single point of failure. In fact, and I've told Togo this, I don't want to be the one that has to handle the wallet with the donation address since it is a big responsibly. How about if you and someone else keep each other accountable instead?
I have to say, you often make me sound like a bad person, saying I was greedy, now saying everything is going into my pocket. I don't know what your deal is but I hope you repent from your unloving ways. I am here for the children, if I wasn't, I would be long gone than have to stand up to your insults.
Mike,
You just made a quote before my post, stipulating that I've placed an address on everyones wallet where we have NO ACCOUNTABILITY for funds sent to it. You basically said "Rob handles this" but we dont even know what was sent to it. (Which I explained is not the case - I wrote an RPC report to show every BBP that goes to it). That insinuates that I created a system to hide money. But in reality I had a vision for accountability.biblepay.org to be able to reconcile every bbp In, and every bbp Out so it is all tied to an expense that has a receipt. So it felt like an attack on the system, meaning your system was going to replace my faulty one. So I pointed out how this new system does not actually solve anything, it creates less accountability. So I would suggest asking more questions and learning more about whats actually going on before making misleading posts and creating a system that adds complexity and attempts to work around the problem.
Regarding Greed, you created a Good botnet that pulls in 20% of all Biblepay mining revenue for yourself, and then wrote a post in the vote for StakeRequired-Per-RAC that we shouldnt have any requirement. Obviously this triggers the personal feeling - of course, then you could control even more of the pie. I apologized for that, because I realize it was an ASSUMPTION on my part. Nevertheless it does point to some potential vote bias on your end.
Anyway, please dont insinuate that I need to repent when Im defending the Orphans System, the system created for the orphans, only because you have a warped view - and have had your feelings hurt on this flawed idea, that automatically Im an evil person. Im also here for the children, and the system has to be designed properly, not in a fly by night manner.
First of all there is a difference between single point of failure for funds that are handled for long periods of time vs funds that are immediately spent.
The other issue is when you attack the compassion.com system, you are attacking one that is spent immediately. The superblock funds come in, they are converted and spent, they are not sitting around for months like they would be in a charitable sanctuary.
In my view we have been doing quite fine splitting up the load on charities by creating different people to handle each charity- BLOOM handles their own dispursement, Jaap for Cameroon, Me for compassion, etc. Im all for splitting the load and having more accountability. Its being doing through the proposal system naturally as it is.
Thats why Im so confused as to what this Charity commission would be, I dont know what "ins and outs are".
