First of all: thanks so much for all your hard work! I party agree that doing all this should be compensated. But I also think your proposal is something that I have concerns about.
I think that when people realize you can effectively ask money for doing pr, we may get an army of money hungry 'shills', which may help the coin grow in the short term, but I don't like it. For example, the same 'shills' might get angry and damage the coin if they realise they won't get paid.
Remember that (asian?) guy who was on bitcointalk who seemed to have his heart in the right place, and built a very amateurish blog, and kept asking for coins afterwards? I'm afraid that a lot of people will follow in his steps, and make proposals up to our necks asking for money, cluttering the proposal-list and taking up the time of sanctuary-holders who have to sort through all the proposals.
I think it's maybe better if we set up bounties or something. Or at least something that is simple and clear for all parties. I see other coins doing bounties and it seems to work really well. And we can vote on a bounty budget from the pr with the sanctuaries.
Yeah, I think that pr-stuff needs to be discussed and outlined beforehand, and not billed afterwards. Not that I don't think you should get some compensation.
(And of course, you're also being compensated by the rising of the value of your BBP as a direct result of your hard work, and I also think a lot of the things you did, you did because you believed in the project with your heart, and not because you wanted to get paid for doing it.)
I don't really have an answer to my 'problem', and I fully agree you have to get paid for your other proposals, but I just want to speak my mind on this one