2461
TestNet Discussion Archive / Re: TestNet - BiblePay-Evolution & GSCs (Generic Smart Contracts)
« on: March 29, 2019, 12:13:11 PM »
Also, please re-enter any proposals again. I re-entered one.
Show Posts
This section allows you to view all posts made by this member. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to.
2462
TestNet Discussion Archive / Re: TestNet - BiblePay-Evolution & GSCs (Generic Smart Contracts)
« on: March 29, 2019, 11:41:35 AM »
I'm in agreement on 3 nodes:
getblockhash 3550
c4dafb2ddfa0a3f734fda2049c1a54ad46b4b87d19e0c11ac1d0cca6ac5d3812
Please ensure your sancs have enough collateral (if you started them after 3550) and that you rejoin the pog campaign if you joined after 3550.
getblockhash 3550
c4dafb2ddfa0a3f734fda2049c1a54ad46b4b87d19e0c11ac1d0cca6ac5d3812
Please ensure your sancs have enough collateral (if you started them after 3550) and that you rejoin the pog campaign if you joined after 3550.
2463
TestNet Discussion Archive / Re: TestNet - BiblePay-Evolution & GSCs (Generic Smart Contracts)
« on: March 29, 2019, 11:30:45 AM »
1.4.0.5 - TestNet Mandatory Upgrade
- 2 min testnet blocks in testnet after block 5000 (diff was too low for
anti-fork code)
- Remove log spam
- Add GSCTransmission icon to txlist
- Fix getchaintips
- Add end_epoch to GSC Smart contract (prevents a type of validation
error)
- Verify CPK is in good standing before transmitting a GSC transmission
- Correct block subsidy on GSC server side total to account for first
reward
- Disconnect old versions (prior to 1405 in testnet)
- Add feature to logger to prevent duplicate log rows
** Critical instructions for upgrade: Please clean the blocks data first, then restart the node, and in addition please ensure you delete these governance files:
rm blocks -r
rm chainstate -r
rm evodb -r
rm gov*
rm mnc*
rm mnp*
(One of our superblock calculations was incorrect -- and its cached in our nodes, hence the reason we went off the rails, so now we have to ensure this data is deleted before restarting).
The chain is rolling back to block 3500 or so, will post a hash.
- 2 min testnet blocks in testnet after block 5000 (diff was too low for
anti-fork code)
- Remove log spam
- Add GSCTransmission icon to txlist
- Fix getchaintips
- Add end_epoch to GSC Smart contract (prevents a type of validation
error)
- Verify CPK is in good standing before transmitting a GSC transmission
- Correct block subsidy on GSC server side total to account for first
reward
- Disconnect old versions (prior to 1405 in testnet)
- Add feature to logger to prevent duplicate log rows
** Critical instructions for upgrade: Please clean the blocks data first, then restart the node, and in addition please ensure you delete these governance files:
rm blocks -r
rm chainstate -r
rm evodb -r
rm gov*
rm mnc*
rm mnp*
(One of our superblock calculations was incorrect -- and its cached in our nodes, hence the reason we went off the rails, so now we have to ensure this data is deleted before restarting).
The chain is rolling back to block 3500 or so, will post a hash.
2464
TestNet Discussion Archive / Re: TestNet - BiblePay-Evolution & GSCs (Generic Smart Contracts)
« on: March 29, 2019, 09:34:56 AM »Dear Rob,
Thank you for all your hard work that MIP and you and others have put into the development and maintenance. Glad to help and be part of testnet.
Can I make one small suggestion, if I may? Each time after a Mandatory Update - at least on Testnet where this is so frequent - can you kindly post the latest block and blockhash so that we can all periodically check that we are on the right chain as we may have missed these frequent updates as we were away or something.
That would be greatly appreciated! Thank you.
Yes, will do. I already realize that this needs done, but what intereferes in testnet, sometimes our testnet chain legally continues after I shut my nodes down. Meaning that you guys are technically the ones that should post a good hash on the forum once all the nodes resync (as sometimes its out of my control).
But anyhow, in this case, we are making a mandatory that will require us all to delete our cached gov objs, and resync, so I think in this case I will be able to post a good hash after we all upgrade.
Building...
2465
TestNet Discussion Archive / Re: TestNet - BiblePay-Evolution & GSCs (Generic Smart Contracts)
« on: March 29, 2019, 07:36:36 AM »On TestNet...Can you please send tBBP: ygM8C2FbeMxSCd77TNZNAyTUmym9nwgCFL
Welcome aboard; please hang on.
I noticed last night an unusually high amount of spam in our debug logs.
Let me take care of this spam, the mandatory upgrade version, and anything that looks strange, and then make a release for testnet.
ETA about 3 more hours.
2466
TestNet Discussion Archive / Re: TestNet - BiblePay-Evolution & GSCs (Generic Smart Contracts)
« on: March 28, 2019, 07:40:04 PM »
EDIT:
Ill need to release a mandatory upgrade tomorrow morning to ensure everyone is on the same chain. We have too many old versions floating around.
Ill need to release a mandatory upgrade tomorrow morning to ensure everyone is on the same chain. We have too many old versions floating around.
2467
TestNet Discussion Archive / Re: TestNet - BiblePay-Evolution & GSCs (Generic Smart Contracts)
« on: March 28, 2019, 05:59:23 PM »May I have few questions?
Please see inline:
1. You say ABN weight is about 5005. His stake was 30953. Is it because he did not have a coin with lower value?
-> Yes, his lowest coin * age was 30953. If he had smaller coins it would have used those instead.
2. From this it seems beneficiary to have multiple smaller coins, otherwise all larger ones would be spent on mining. Is exec bankroll working in evolution?
-> Imho, I think in prod, the average coin will be more like 5000 due to the spending and rewards, and requirements so much higher it will always take multiple coins to make a stake -- and in this system, it automatically combines multiple coins to make a stake. We don't have exec bankroll in evo. I cant think of a reason we need it (for this use case). But, we could port it though just to have it so we can consolidate coins easier for people with a lot of change, but even that case is not really going to happen much, since both ABN and GSC-POG makes a lot of consolidated change back to the wallet, so technically in evo, we will have tidy consolidated wallets all the time.
3. iI the ABN weight moving automatically or is it a static setting?
-> Its not completely static. Its a spork setting. But, Im thinking in prod it will be more like 100,000 as its most likely best to set it to be a factor of our money supply and the average capital reqd to solve one block per day, for example. (EDIT: I think it has to be toward the low end closer to 100K so that smaller users can also mine).
4. you wrote "we dont allow stakes sourced from stakes". Does this mean that if a coin is spent on a stake, it cannot be spent on another stake again, even after it ages out?
-> You can re-spend the output of a stake in another block. I just meant from a security perspective with Evo it wont be possible to do any funny business like that.
2468
TestNet Discussion Archive / Re: TestNet - BiblePay-Evolution & GSCs (Generic Smart Contracts)
« on: March 28, 2019, 03:40:34 PM »Kindly confirm if this is also what you are on. The testnet network is really sparse too. Thank you.Yes, your on it!
bbpd@testnet:~$ block
4111
bbpd@testnet:~$ cli getblockhash 4111
fe1c896a86d64c3986807a33109a73a51a069c96693f9a99af71c41a9d5452bc
2469
TestNet Discussion Archive / Re: TestNet - BiblePay-Evolution & GSCs (Generic Smart Contracts)
« on: March 28, 2019, 03:00:33 PM »1.4.0.4-TestNet Mandatory Upgrade
- Enhance ABN mining (allow miner to sleep if block is not late and ABN
is insufficient, ensure all miners wake up when blocks are late)
- Enable daily superblock logic
As you upgrade each node, please re-sync. You could be on your own chain (as this was a mandatory) and it was not released with a cutover height.
2470
TestNet Discussion Archive / Re: TestNet - BiblePay-Evolution & GSCs (Generic Smart Contracts)
« on: March 28, 2019, 12:17:21 PM »
I added the BBP reward amount to the prominence rows for the next version.
2471
TestNet Discussion Archive / Re: TestNet - BiblePay-Evolution & GSCs (Generic Smart Contracts)
« on: March 28, 2019, 12:12:47 PM »Cancel that last post; we are now waiting for block 3505 in a hands-off fashion.
The last superblock was not paid before everyone upgraded, so it was also a regular block.
Ok, I think we did it. I received a reward for 3505.
2472
TestNet Discussion Archive / Re: TestNet - BiblePay-Evolution & GSCs (Generic Smart Contracts)
« on: March 28, 2019, 11:46:10 AM »
Cancel that last post; we are now waiting for block 3505 in a hands-off fashion.
The last superblock was not paid before everyone upgraded, so it was also a regular block.
The last superblock was not paid before everyone upgraded, so it was also a regular block.
2473
TestNet Discussion Archive / Re: TestNet - BiblePay-Evolution & GSCs (Generic Smart Contracts)
« on: March 28, 2019, 11:03:32 AM »
1.4.0.4-TestNet Mandatory Upgrade
- Enhance ABN mining (allow miner to sleep if block is not late and ABN
is insufficient, ensure all miners wake up when blocks are late)
- Enable daily superblock logic
- Enhance ABN mining (allow miner to sleep if block is not late and ABN
is insufficient, ensure all miners wake up when blocks are late)
- Enable daily superblock logic
2474
TestNet Discussion Archive / Re: TestNet - BiblePay-Evolution & GSCs (Generic Smart Contracts)
« on: March 28, 2019, 10:13:45 AM »
So, I see the reason we didn't pay at the last superblock. I'm going to try to create a release really quick, if we can get a good chunk of us upgraded by block 3300, we have a shot at checking to see if the bug is dead.
Building....
Building....
2475
TestNet Discussion Archive / Re: TestNet - BiblePay-Evolution & GSCs (Generic Smart Contracts)
« on: March 28, 2019, 07:57:58 AM »
** GSC Update **
Overall I'm pretty excited that we are making 'normal' progress for the most part.
Good and not-perfect news.
The good news is block 3095 (our last superblock) was voted on by 3 sancs, so it had 3 votes, and technically it should have emitted, but-- 3095 was a regular block. Its hard to say exactly why it didnt emit, it could either be not running watchman (doubtful that is the issue), or could be something to do with the height being a daily height, anyway I'll research this in detail now and find out what happened to our payments. So at this point everyone who was waiting for the daily got skipped and now we are waiting for block 3300 (although we don't want to hold our breath, as the problem now needs solved for 3300 to work).
On the bright side, our blocks become 1 minute blocks after height 3200 so testing should start zipping by faster with faster progress.
According to getgovernanceinfo, we have until height 4305 for our 'monthly' superblock - thats when we see the outcome of our QT proposals.
Ill check into this daily superblock issue now...
Great work everyone!
exec prominence shows 9 users in the leaderboard for height 3300.
Overall I'm pretty excited that we are making 'normal' progress for the most part.
Good and not-perfect news.
The good news is block 3095 (our last superblock) was voted on by 3 sancs, so it had 3 votes, and technically it should have emitted, but-- 3095 was a regular block. Its hard to say exactly why it didnt emit, it could either be not running watchman (doubtful that is the issue), or could be something to do with the height being a daily height, anyway I'll research this in detail now and find out what happened to our payments. So at this point everyone who was waiting for the daily got skipped and now we are waiting for block 3300 (although we don't want to hold our breath, as the problem now needs solved for 3300 to work).
On the bright side, our blocks become 1 minute blocks after height 3200 so testing should start zipping by faster with faster progress.
According to getgovernanceinfo, we have until height 4305 for our 'monthly' superblock - thats when we see the outcome of our QT proposals.
Ill check into this daily superblock issue now...
Great work everyone!
exec prominence shows 9 users in the leaderboard for height 3300.