Messages

4141

TestNet Discussion Archive / Re: BIBLEPAY - TESTNET THREAD - TESTING SANCTUARIES FOR GO LIVE AT CHRISTMAS

« on: October 27, 2017, 12:59:18 PM »

ADMIN:

im idiot i must go telnet3 folder in main folder ... no setup main masternode but masternode in telnet3 folder   

PROBLEM NEXT:

when tried run masternode by masternode start-alias IVANKA from DEBUG CONSOLE on WINWALLET(controller wallet )failed: but when i run it by MIXING BUTTON, i see my masternode in peerlist.... its OK?

Great!  Yeah, the txid just needed to confirm.  Since the tx is in your winwallet, just wait for 6 blocks to pass then do a 'getrawtransaction txid 1' and then you should see it, and your masternode start command should then work.  (As long IP is recognized on the network as public).

So I see your IP in my sanctuary list right now, so it looks like you are good

4142

Archived Proposals / Re: New Logo Contest

« on: October 27, 2017, 12:41:01 PM »

Sent 10k.

4143

Archived Proposals / Re: New Logo Contest

« on: October 27, 2017, 12:40:02 PM »

Lets recognize this logo contest West is holding for us, and thank West for holding the contest.


His donation address is :
BGtF8NTiUF3cTMJ62Ps7G1wtYU7sD5nkvG


At our current market price (.0007), we will need to raise 571,000 biblepay coins to pay for this $400 expense as a community!  (Without waiting til January to create a proposal).  So I think we need to start pitching in on this one so he is reimbursed for his credit card expense. 




Please consider donating for our logo.

4144

Archived Proposals / Re: New Logo Contest

« on: October 27, 2017, 12:34:45 PM »

Reimaged B

Thats pretty sweet.  I think B is slightly better than A, but thats my personal opinion, any changes guys, any color changes or ideas that wont peeve the designer?

4145

TestNet Discussion Archive / Re: BIBLEPAY - TESTNET THREAD - TESTING SANCTUARIES FOR GO LIVE AT CHRISTMAS

« on: October 24, 2017, 06:05:15 PM »

I tried to help him, but this seems a strange error. Can't really find anything online. Thing is: he also does something with storj, and that's also on port 40001. But changing the port doesn't seem to help...

Lets check to see if his port is blocked and if he is modifying the correct masternode file?
Klondike, for testnet the correct file is : %appdata%\testnet3\masternode.conf.
Next, ensure the port is 40001 for testnet (I see you did that).
Ensure you are not listening on 40001 for anything else?
telnet yourip 40001 from another machine on your lan?

4146

TestNet Discussion Archive / Re: BIBLEPAY - TESTNET THREAD - TESTING SANCTUARIES FOR GO LIVE AT CHRISTMAS

« on: October 24, 2017, 06:04:02 PM »

I guess the question is where does that 5000 go initially?  Is it going to the Orphan Fund or just being burned?  You could send it to a  special address like the Orphan Fund, and using the conditional transaction fund logic you're building for wallet-to-wallet trading, make it a conditional transaction to either return to the sender or go on to the Orphan Fund/Burned.

The 5000 goes to the orphan address now, but Im sure we will have to change that to a burn address after sancs go live, because orphans will be paid out of the budget.
I dont follow you on the conditional payment; even if retirement account trading was live, there would be no way to send a payment back to a person from someones wallet, that would be like stealing from a random trader.  All money minted from the money supply must come from the coinbase tx.  So the only way to do this is either vote on the refund, or have him add it to the proposal.  Of course the latter is easier

4147

TestNet Discussion Archive / Re: BIBLEPAY - TESTNET THREAD - TESTING SANCTUARIES FOR GO LIVE AT CHRISTMAS

« on: October 22, 2017, 01:27:28 PM »

You should raise the cost of proposals to 5000 but have it so that if it passes, that fee is refunded.

Yeah, I like that.  You know they can ask for 5000 more in the proposal, then get it back automatically.

Its tricky to code in a refund, since the money has to come from somewhere.

I am still working on looking at that issue where the No votes arent showing up; been tied up adding something new to the pool.

In the mean time people can still do more testing on the news feature; ensure its at least solid as far as what was originally written.

We can then re-brand it from news to use it as a built in help guide for creating masternodes at least.

Or maybe call it an 'article'.  Just an ability to list articles, add an article, and read articles. 

4148

TestNet Discussion Archive / Re: BIBLEPAY - TESTNET THREAD - TESTING SANCTUARIES FOR GO LIVE AT CHRISTMAS

« on: October 18, 2017, 10:29:56 AM »

Looking good
Where does the 5 BBP come from? The balance of the person creating the proposal?

Right now, it comes out of the pool wallet and does not even charge you, but that needs fixed.  So as to prevent spam.
Another problem is the pool is only allowed to submit one proposal per superblock, so thats got to be changed somehow.

Im still hunting down why our No votes arent showing.  Ill check that next.

We also need to raise the cost of a proposal to more like 5000 BBP so as to weed out frivilous proposals.

4149

TestNet Discussion Archive / Re: BIBLEPAY - TESTNET THREAD - TESTING SANCTUARIES FOR GO LIVE AT CHRISTMAS

« on: October 17, 2017, 08:42:22 AM »

It worked this time Well. at first I got the same error, but mnsync status didn't say '999' yet. I tried it a second time and it worked.

In the previous round, when I tried it, I first checked mnsync status, and it did say '999' and I still got the error, but maybe I should have waited a bit longer (for voting, I first fire up the testnet controller wallet, because normally that pc is on the mainnet, so maybe it's just a syncing thing on my end).

Good, well I think they are different errors, when someone creates a new proposal, 5 BBP has to be burned.  Somehow on that first one you created, I saw the txid but the burnt was not in the chain.  On the new one I see the burned BBP. 

Maybe a different error text is emitted when your node isnt synced yet.  I guess we will find out soon enough.


Its looking pretty good now overall, but I see a little bug in the pool where it is not showing 4 negative votes on the substance vote yet.  Its a strange bug, when I debug the code, it works, when it runs in the pool it doesnt.  Havent had that problem on the pool yet.


Anyway, I wonder how we are all syncing?   I havent had an issue staying in sync on my 3 cold sanctuaries- can we do a little tests? 


08:41:19

getblockhash 14700


08:41:19

8c4d078c31c7cdf700af58b5db36a854b93339c70c488e39c8b8386a664578b2


Is general opinion that sanctuaries seem to be solid now?  Other than "watchdog expired" (Im working on relaxing that btw by 400%, already modified a lot of the code for the watchdog for prod and for the Restart Required).

4150

TestNet Discussion Archive / Re: BIBLEPAY - TESTNET THREAD - TESTING SANCTUARIES FOR GO LIVE AT CHRISTMAS

« on: October 16, 2017, 10:25:31 PM »

You're right, the pool created a gobject and I tried to vote 'no'. Sadly, I got this:

Code: [Select]

{
  "overall": "Voted successfully 0 time(s) and failed 1 time(s).",
  "detail": {
    "MN1": {
      "result": "failed",
      "errorMessage": "GOVERNANCE_EXCEPTION_WARNING:CGovernanceManager::ProcessVote -- Unknown parent object , MN outpoint = fd5cb3ef632fb25a40665d1b4da0c1cd992c4f3d99ef38ce1ddf725ecfe53836-0, governance object hash = d418d2c8860147caa5ce3d62576a804384e830d67b8adf465d8f0b7ae87609f0\n"
    }
  }
}


Thanks, this is a complicated issue- something to do with governance hash collateral missing.  I added code to the pool to recover from this.  It can now move the proposal back to the beginning phase and resubmit the collateral, and then submit the gobject automatically. 

I just deployed it and hit it and it looks like it created a new proposal for us.  I just voted No on it, please try now

4151

TestNet Discussion Archive / Re: BIBLEPAY - TESTNET THREAD - TESTING SANCTUARIES FOR GO LIVE AT CHRISTMAS

« on: October 16, 2017, 05:29:32 PM »

I already did that, haha! I can create topics

Ok, cool, I added a post to the topic and I see the "buy heroin" proposal in the list - LOL.  Yeah, the reason you cant vote No on it yet is the pool has not created a gobject for it yet.  The underlying cause, I think, is each masternode can only create one proposal per superblock cycle. 

I have some company coming over so I dont think I can look now, but in the night, if you see a Submitted=1 and submitteddatetime, then you can vote no on it.

4152

TestNet Discussion Archive / Re: BIBLEPAY - TESTNET THREAD - TESTING SANCTUARIES FOR GO LIVE AT CHRISTMAS

« on: October 16, 2017, 04:28:40 PM »

I voted on the Orphan proposal, and as far as I can tell it went fine:

Code: [Select]

{
  "overall": "Voted successfully 1 time(s) and failed 0 time(s).",
  "detail": {
    "MN1": {
      "result": "success"
    }
  }
}

I tried to create a 'tacky proposal'. I set it up on the pool side, but I don't know what step to take next. Do I have to do anything with my masternode?

Hi bud,

Great, on the vote!  So on tacky, I dont know if you can create topics on this forum, can you just try and we can learn together? Try to create a forum topic and put a blurb in there about how you are spending the money and make it tacky.  Then use that as the URL for the new proposal.

4153

TestNet Discussion Archive / Re: BIBLEPAY - TESTNET THREAD - TESTING SANCTUARIES FOR GO LIVE AT CHRISTMAS

« on: October 16, 2017, 12:09:02 PM »

I just added Budgets to the pool; now we have Proposals, Budgets and Funded Proposals.

Ill explain budgets once we get a few things in the budget, right now, just vote on the Orphan proposal once it has a "SubmittedDateTime" populated.

Also, still need someone to create a tacky proposal and a good proposal for us to vote on - I want these to be done on machines other than mine so I can simulate the autonomous sanctuary network.

4154

TestNet Discussion Archive / Re: BIBLEPAY - TESTNET THREAD - TESTING SANCTUARIES FOR GO LIVE AT CHRISTMAS

« on: October 16, 2017, 12:06:56 PM »

About 1: I clicked the fake ones, because they were the only ones that showed options when right-clicking them. The one with the proposal just shows a thin blank box. I'm using chrome btw, and didn't test with another browser.
I would try to create the good and bad proposal, but I'm still struggling with the basics as of now.

About 2: It just seems a coïncedence. My wallet crashed last night, maybe because I was testing to mine and simultaneously be a masternode. All seems fine now. Sadly I can't getblockhash right now, since I don't have access to that computer right now.

Could you maybe explain in more detail what you mean with "select * from votes"? You also told me something similar some time ago, but I don't exactly understand what I should do. I do still get sanctuary payments, so I'm guessing watchman is running, but I don't know how to test it...

Yeah, the proposals in testnet are not in a state that I expected, I had to recreate the data a couple times today to get the chart working, but starting now, I just recreated the Orphan proposal (the only non-voted non-fake proposal in the list).  Its waiting for the pool to submit it to the network.  Once you see Submitted DateTime set, go ahead vote on it everyone.

On the checking on the watchman, just type:
sqlite3 Watchman
.table
select * from votes;

See if anything is in there, if there is, its definitely working as you cannot receive 1 record if it is not working.

4155

TestNet Discussion Archive / Re: BIBLEPAY - TESTNET THREAD - TESTING SANCTUARIES FOR GO LIVE AT CHRISTMAS

« on: October 16, 2017, 07:32:39 AM »

I guess so. Mine seems to be down also...

Also, when I click 'Copy vote for budget' a 'copied to clipboard' window pops up, but it just says 'Unable to locate Budget.'

1) What gobjectid are you right clicking on so I can reproduce? (Just first 5 characters is fine).  Dont use the fake ones #1-5, I created those just for the chart im writing.  Still need two people to create the good one and fake one.

2) Regarding going down, I dont think we actually went down, I think either some masternodes banned each other or maybe watchdog isnt working on those nodes.  First, please each individual sanctuary, test your watchdog to see if its working by doing the select * from votes, just to ensure watchman is actually working. 

Next, delete your banlist.dat file.

I am looking at my masternodes and Im still synced and dont have anyone banned.  So Im really wondering whats wrong, I dont see a problem where we are banning each other.  Im leaning towards the masternodes exceeded the threshhold when told "restart required" and never restarted.

Right now I see 3 enabled - lets see if we are all on the same fork?

getblockhash 13680:
c3ce1181965b9652866a35a585dccdfdb047a8b20dc694fc2958ff51d55ec189