Messages

16

TestNet Discussion Archive / Re: BIBLEPAY - TESTNET THREAD - TESTING SANCTUARIES FOR GO LIVE AT CHRISTMAS

« on: December 18, 2017, 10:02:32 PM »

Just won for the first time. It was also a 'doubleblock'.

congrats !     I'm still emptyhanded

17

TestNet Discussion Archive / Re: BIBLEPAY - TESTNET THREAD - TESTING SANCTUARIES FOR GO LIVE AT CHRISTMAS

« on: December 18, 2017, 04:01:07 PM »

You're welcome I wonder what will happen in the next couple of days, since we both haven't 'won' anything yet.

this is unpredictable imho.  I don't understand the secret set of rules here .

in the meantime :
  "21718": "BCb8B85R4mpuiy62Sbs9W4Xv2w5CVEJ5TS:3",
  "21719": "BCb8B85R4mpuiy62Sbs9W4Xv2w5CVEJ5TS:7",
  "21720": "BLWrBmujyTdv2qxwn8KDFpUFrTvH7AbmD1:7",
  "21721": "BLWrBmujyTdv2qxwn8KDFpUFrTvH7AbmD1:4",
  "21722": "BNkdFRRo2Cycyvc37tVaNW4FCiFDrR9QDV:4",
  "21723": "BNkdFRRo2Cycyvc37tVaNW4FCiFDrR9QDV:4",
  "21724": "BQ4kjMzQUEcQdMMpvhDMNt2McfhxzKztRX:3",
  "21725": "BQ4kjMzQUEcQdMMpvhDMNt2McfhxzKztRX:7",
  "21726": "B5Ac1kfZd47aogmrHKzQM1SR65f2HidfJJ:3",
  "21727": "B5Ac1kfZd47aogmrHKzQM1SR65f2HidfJJ:4",

18

TestNet Discussion Archive / Re: BIBLEPAY - TESTNET THREAD - TESTING SANCTUARIES FOR GO LIVE AT CHRISTMAS

« on: December 18, 2017, 03:35:46 PM »

Nice to hear it already worked.

I found the fix that Alex posted. I'll just post it anyway for future reference:

https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=2388064.msg26467807#msg26467807

thank you Jaapgvk  ! 

19

TestNet Discussion Archive / Re: BIBLEPAY - TESTNET THREAD - TESTING SANCTUARIES FOR GO LIVE AT CHRISTMAS

« on: December 18, 2017, 03:23:34 PM »

Did you also restart your masternode with the 'masternode start-alias' function?

Anyway, there is a fix that I also applied when it didn't work. It involves generating a new private-key. Let me just try and find it

thanks Jaapgvk  ,    I fixed it by deleting the old wallet and restarting the daemon

20

TestNet Discussion Archive / Re: BIBLEPAY - TESTNET THREAD - TESTING SANCTUARIES FOR GO LIVE AT CHRISTMAS

« on: December 18, 2017, 03:21:47 PM »

just applied WIN apdate and restaarted both MN and controller.   still

 "UPDATE_REQUIRED" and

Code: [Select]

  "vin": "CTxIn(COutPoint(0000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000, 4294967295), coinbase )",
  "service": "2:40000",
  "status": "Not capable masternode: Invalid protocol version"


./biblepay-cli getinfo
{
  "version": 1000609,
  "protocolversion": 70712,
  "walletversion": 61000,
  "wallet_fullversion": "1.0.6.9",



answering to myself for the record :

 delete the wallet and start it from scratch ?

sanctuary wallet is empty anyway .

thanks PewPewGoesTheDuck for help

21

TestNet Discussion Archive / Re: BIBLEPAY - TESTNET THREAD - TESTING SANCTUARIES FOR GO LIVE AT CHRISTMAS

« on: December 18, 2017, 02:50:11 PM »

I also had that problem with a previous update. It will probably fix itself when you start the masternode from the upgraded wallet.

just applied WIN apdate and restaarted both MN and controller.   still

 "UPDATE_REQUIRED" and

Code: [Select]

  "vin": "CTxIn(COutPoint(0000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000, 4294967295), coinbase )",
  "service": "2:40000",
  "status": "Not capable masternode: Invalid protocol version"


./biblepay-cli getinfo
{
  "version": 1000609,
  "protocolversion": 70712,
  "walletversion": 61000,
  "wallet_fullversion": "1.0.6.9",



22

TestNet Discussion Archive / Re: BIBLEPAY - TESTNET THREAD - TESTING SANCTUARIES FOR GO LIVE AT CHRISTMAS

« on: December 18, 2017, 02:27:48 PM »

I applied 1069 on my MN . 

now it shows :

  "vin": "CTxIn(COutPoint(0000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000, 4294967295), coinbase )",
  "service": "...................:40000",
  "status": "Not capable masternode: Invalid protocol version"


what does it mean ?    do I need to update controller to fix it .   WIN wallet is not ready yet for download  .

23

TestNet Discussion Archive / Re: BIBLEPAY - TESTNET THREAD - TESTING SANCTUARIES FOR GO LIVE AT CHRISTMAS

« on: December 18, 2017, 11:56:00 AM »

That's cheap indeed I wonder what the hashrate will be.

I've been using your hyperexpert suggestion for my masternode. Working great so far

forgot to add a ref link .     kidding .  glad it was useful for someone

24

TestNet Discussion Archive / Re: BIBLEPAY - TESTNET THREAD - TESTING SANCTUARIES FOR GO LIVE AT CHRISTMAS

« on: December 17, 2017, 10:25:55 PM »

if anybody wants to try this provider for mining  :  https://hive.happybeehost.com/cart.php?a=confproduct&i=0


$6 for a 4CPU/2GB VPS is not bad at all 

25

TestNet Discussion Archive / Re: BIBLEPAY - TESTNET THREAD - TESTING SANCTUARIES FOR GO LIVE AT CHRISTMAS

« on: December 17, 2017, 08:35:18 AM »

Yes I am doing that.  The question is does it impact Masternodes and two, what is the ideal setting for those who are using Vultr.

I won't go above genproclimit=1 for mining if you have 1 or 2 core MN 

26

Archived Proposals / Re: First Prod Test Proposal

« on: December 15, 2017, 02:25:23 PM »

Rob , how voting is supposed to work .  What do I do to approve or disapprove it ?


BTW,   I am an experienced SQL dev and admin . worked for big banks and telecoms.  If you think I can be of any use for SQL related stuff pls let me know or PM

27

TestNet Discussion Archive / Re: BIBLEPAY - TESTNET THREAD - TESTING SANCTUARIES FOR GO LIVE AT CHRISTMAS

« on: December 13, 2017, 07:59:26 PM »

check out this provider for VPS  :  https://www.hyperexpert.com

1GB 1CPU $3
2GB 2CPU $5

I've been  using it on testnet with no problems so far .

28

TestNet Discussion Archive / Re: BIBLEPAY - TESTNET THREAD - TESTING SANCTUARIES FOR GO LIVE AT CHRISTMAS

« on: December 12, 2017, 10:57:13 PM »

Hi Tiras,

It should be very similar to testnet.  Once the mandatory is released we will have a certain block number announced where the Sanctuaries actually enable themselves.  You can still send the escrow to the address early, and get the VM ready.  But the masternodelist wont populate until after that block number kicks over.

Once that kicks over, the sanctuaries should start talking to each other and voting to pay each other.  We will also have a separate block number for the first superblock.  I think we will need to space that out to give time for the new nodes to acclimate themselves (maybe 15-25 days later).

We also need to remember to send instructions for people to switch their watchman-on-the-wall configs over to Prod.

Rob

thanks Rob.

sounds good.  we can set it up before the holidays.

>>We also need to remember to send instructions for people to switch their watchman-on-the-wall configs over to Prod.

Can a test sanctuary be just reconfigured  to run on the main network then ?

29

TestNet Discussion Archive / Re: BIBLEPAY - TESTNET THREAD - TESTING SANCTUARIES FOR GO LIVE AT CHRISTMAS

« on: December 10, 2017, 09:49:51 PM »

Hi Admin , 

what will be the procedure of promoting masternodes after or on Christmas ?

Will it be enough to start  a sanctuary and masternode on the main network as we did for testing  or there is anything else involved ?

thanks

30

TestNet Discussion Archive / Re: BIBLEPAY - TESTNET THREAD - TESTING SANCTUARIES FOR GO LIVE AT CHRISTMAS

« on: November 26, 2017, 05:01:35 PM »

I think klondike already answered but I wanted to add:
The masternode requires a status of "999" before it actually listens to our commands (I know, pain), so add this into the process:
After rebooting a masternode wait until 'mnsync status' shows 999, then issue the commands from the controller like start-many etc.

I did prove the other day that you do not have to restart a masternode (physically) when it says new start required.  You can do the start-many and it will respond, as long as its already synced.

Another words life in prod should be like this:

As days go by, and no upgrades are being pushed out:  If you ever see new start required, you go to your controller and issue the start-many command.

Reboots should only be necessary when upgrades (to the software) are required.

thanks Admin.  good to know for future