Bible Pay

Recent Posts

Pages: 1 2 3 4 [5] 6 7 8 9 10
41
I have three wallets. Only one was syncing to the tip (and had the same blockhash as you have), but that one didn't have a CPID associated with it. I just associated a CPID with that one, so let's wait and see if that's going to work.

The other two I'll try to resync...

Something is starting to happen now... I think.


Yes- all the wallets are clicking up now in tandem.  We had some type of problem based on where we sputtered out (right at the block before the last boinc superblock) and since our masternodes were all dead, the wallet couldnt come to consensus on that superblock.  Now we are past it and we have 6 or so testers online.  We just need to bring up our sancs now.

42
Thanks all - Ive relaunched 4 nodes and 2 are mining.  Although each block I solve is having trouble being added to the other nodes.
But, I believe we are back in the same state we were in prior to the QT fiasco, so Im thinking we just need another miner online now.

Lets be patient and see if another miner allows us to sync.  Im on block :
getblockhash 67726
35fa0d84e64d0fb0b4ec6a05588d8b38b42967e5acbebaa5384e780d10f55728

I have three wallets. Only one was syncing to the tip (and had the same blockhash as you have), but that one didn't have a CPID associated with it. I just associated a CPID with that one, so let's wait and see if that's going to work.

The other two I'll try to resync...
43
Alright, I've updated all my wallets and deleted the .dat's you suggested. Resynching now...

Thanks all - Ive relaunched 4 nodes and 2 are mining.  Although each block I solve is having trouble being added to the other nodes.
But, I believe we are back in the same state we were in prior to the QT fiasco, so Im thinking we just need another miner online now.

Lets be patient and see if another miner allows us to sync.  Im on block :
getblockhash 67726
35fa0d84e64d0fb0b4ec6a05588d8b38b42967e5acbebaa5384e780d10f55728
44
Production Proposals / Re: Proposal - listing BBP on GIN MN platform
« Last post by jaapgvk on September 19, 2018, 09:39:02 am »
I also like this proposal :)
45
When you guys re-sync today, please delete your mnc*.* and mnp*.* files and the banlist.dat also first.

I have found that we may be caching a superblock (in the govobj system) with a bad payment - and I believe that will fix our sync issue in testnet.

Alright, I've updated all my wallets and deleted the .dat's you suggested. Resynching now...
46
Oops, after I removed QT, I just realized one of the chain parameters in testnet was adjusted to look back 30 days for the QT 'governanceinfo' prior total (this was for future qt).... Sorry...

Please all, upgrade to 1.1.5.4b....

Building windows now.


MacOS version for testnet also available.
47
Oops, after I removed QT, I just realized one of the chain parameters in testnet was adjusted to look back 30 days for the QT 'governanceinfo' prior total (this was for future qt).... Sorry...

Please all, upgrade to 1.1.5.4b....

Building windows now.


We can talk about the cpids solving ability tomorrow after we resync again.

Thanks.

When you guys re-sync today, please delete your mnc*.* and mnp*.* files and the banlist.dat also first.

I have found that we may be caching a superblock (in the govobj system) with a bad payment - and I believe that will fix our sync issue in testnet.


48
Production Proposals / Re: Proposal - listing BBP on GIN MN platform
« Last post by Rob A. on September 19, 2018, 03:41:35 am »
I think we need to look past the price of $14 on this one, and have a hosted service (like GIN) available in our arsenal for the Non Technical users.

I see we have the same sort of arguments in this thread repeating (people with closed minds who view things one way).  We need to start thinking out of the box, and thinking of newbies.

(A technical minded entrepeneur may go out and start their own version of Gin and charge $1 a month and see if you can live on that, but it may go out of business).

I support this proposal, but our budget is too small this month.

49
All - I decided to remove QT (quant tightening) due to lack of popularity.

Please get 1.1.5.4, and resync the chain.

Windows is compiling...

Oops, after I removed QT, I just realized one of the chain parameters in testnet was adjusted to look back 30 days for the QT 'governanceinfo' prior total (this was for future qt).... Sorry...

Please all, upgrade to 1.1.5.4b....

Building windows now.


We can talk about the cpids solving ability tomorrow after we resync again.

Thanks.

50
My CPID for testnet may have not solved any work in over a month, not sure if thats part of the issue
Pages: 1 2 3 4 [5] 6 7 8 9 10